A Comparative Cost-Benefit Analysis of Conventional and Organic Hazelnuts Production Systems in Center Italy

被引:15
作者
Coppola, Giuseppe [1 ]
Costantini, Michele [1 ]
Orsi, Luigi [1 ]
Facchinetti, Davide [2 ]
Santoro, Francesco [3 ]
Pessina, Domenico [2 ]
Bacenetti, Jacopo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Via G Amendola 165-A, I-70126 Bari, Italy
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
organic and conventional production; hazelnuts; cost-benefit analysis; net present value; internal rate of return; payback time; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture10090409
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In this study, the economic profitability of hazelnut production in central Italy using conventional and organic farming systems was evaluated using the cost-benefit analysis methodology. Viterbo's province is the leading province in Italy in terms of quantity produced. Three indicators were calculated for both farming systems: net present value, payback time, internal rate of return. The analysis was conducted utilizing primary data collected by means of interviews and surveys with local farmers and organizations of producers. The collected production data refer to the decade 2008-2018; a global area of 100.34 ha and 76.14 ha were considered for conventional and organic cultivation, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was carried out considering different discount rates, price variability, and inflation rates. The net present value is equal to 92,800 euro/ha and to 3778 euro/ha, the payback time is 10.47 years and 42.94 years, while the internal rate of return is 12.2% and 1.1% for the conventional and organic production systems, respectively. The conventional production system performs significantly more remuneratively, considering that the price premium paid by the market for the organic product and the subsidies granted to organic farmers are not sufficient to balance the lower yield.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Voluntariness and the bounds of cost-benefit analysis [J].
Sugden, Robert .
BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 7 (04) :954-962
[42]   Stochastic cost-benefit analysis of urban waste-to-energy systems [J].
Haraguchi, Masahiko ;
Siddiqi, Afreen ;
Narayanamurti, Venkatesh .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 224 :751-765
[43]   Cost-Benefit Analysis of Rooftop PV Systems on Utilities and Ratepayers in Thailand [J].
Chaianong, Aksornchan ;
Bangviwat, Athikom ;
Menke, Christoph ;
Darghouth, Naim R. .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (12)
[44]   Comparative analysis of services from soft open points using cost-benefit analysis [J].
Deakin, Matthew ;
Sarantakos, Ilias ;
Greenwood, David ;
Bialek, Janusz ;
Taylor, Phil C. ;
Walker, Sara .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 333
[45]   Organizational systems, commercialization and cost-benefit analysis of Indian space programme [J].
Murthi, K. R. Sridhara ;
Sankar, U. ;
Madhusudhan, H. N. .
CURRENT SCIENCE, 2007, 93 (12) :1812-1822
[46]   Green Payment and Perceived Rural Landscape Quality: A Cost-Benefit Analysis in Central Italy [J].
Cortignani, Raffaele ;
Gobattoni, Federica ;
Pelorosso, Raffaele ;
Ripa, Maria Nicolina .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[47]   Cost-benefit analysis of conventional and modern building materials for sustainable development of social housing [J].
Unni, Aishwariaa ;
Anjali, G. .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 51 :1649-1657
[48]   Extending cost-benefit analysis for the sustainability impact of inter-urban Intelligent Transport Systems [J].
Kolosz, Ben ;
Grant-Muller, Susan .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 50 :167-177
[49]   A cost-benefit analysis of Salmonella-control strategies in Danish pork production [J].
Goldbach, Stine Gissel ;
Alban, Lis .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2006, 77 (1-2) :1-14
[50]   A cost-benefit analysis of water quality protection in the Catawba basin [J].
Eisen-Hecht, JI ;
Kramer, RA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2002, 38 (02) :453-465