A Comparative Cost-Benefit Analysis of Conventional and Organic Hazelnuts Production Systems in Center Italy

被引:15
作者
Coppola, Giuseppe [1 ]
Costantini, Michele [1 ]
Orsi, Luigi [1 ]
Facchinetti, Davide [2 ]
Santoro, Francesco [3 ]
Pessina, Domenico [2 ]
Bacenetti, Jacopo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Via G Amendola 165-A, I-70126 Bari, Italy
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
organic and conventional production; hazelnuts; cost-benefit analysis; net present value; internal rate of return; payback time; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture10090409
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In this study, the economic profitability of hazelnut production in central Italy using conventional and organic farming systems was evaluated using the cost-benefit analysis methodology. Viterbo's province is the leading province in Italy in terms of quantity produced. Three indicators were calculated for both farming systems: net present value, payback time, internal rate of return. The analysis was conducted utilizing primary data collected by means of interviews and surveys with local farmers and organizations of producers. The collected production data refer to the decade 2008-2018; a global area of 100.34 ha and 76.14 ha were considered for conventional and organic cultivation, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was carried out considering different discount rates, price variability, and inflation rates. The net present value is equal to 92,800 euro/ha and to 3778 euro/ha, the payback time is 10.47 years and 42.94 years, while the internal rate of return is 12.2% and 1.1% for the conventional and organic production systems, respectively. The conventional production system performs significantly more remuneratively, considering that the price premium paid by the market for the organic product and the subsidies granted to organic farmers are not sufficient to balance the lower yield.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The origin of cost-benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States
    Jiang, Wei
    Marggraf, Rainer
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [22] Value Typology in Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Baum, Seth D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2012, 21 (04) : 499 - 524
  • [23] Cost-benefit analysis: a disparagement of its misuse and misexplanation
    Linn, Mott, Jr.
    BOTTOM LINE, 2009, 22 (03) : 82 - 85
  • [24] Economics of Sex: Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Houdek, Petr
    Koblovsky, Petr
    SOCIETY, 2017, 54 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [25] New foundations of cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, Matthew
    Posner, Eric A.
    REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2009, 3 (01) : 72 - 83
  • [26] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPY
    Layard, R.
    Clark, D.
    Knapp, M.
    Mayraz, G.
    NATIONAL INSTITUTE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 202 (01) : 90 - 98
  • [27] On the Cognitive Argument for Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Andreas Christiansen
    Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2018, 21 : 217 - 230
  • [28] Cost-Benefit Analysis and the environment: The time horizon is of the essence
    O'Mahony, Tadhg
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2021, 89
  • [29] An environmental cost-benefit analysis of organic and non-organic sheep farming in Iceland
    Merida, Vincent Elijiah
    Cook, David
    Ogmundarson, Olafur
    Daviosdottir, Brynhildur
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2024, 18
  • [30] Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Hiring Process
    Bayraktar, Cahit Ali
    Ozbek, Mukaddes
    2011 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2011,