A Comparative Cost-Benefit Analysis of Conventional and Organic Hazelnuts Production Systems in Center Italy

被引:15
|
作者
Coppola, Giuseppe [1 ]
Costantini, Michele [1 ]
Orsi, Luigi [1 ]
Facchinetti, Davide [2 ]
Santoro, Francesco [3 ]
Pessina, Domenico [2 ]
Bacenetti, Jacopo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Via G Amendola 165-A, I-70126 Bari, Italy
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 09期
关键词
organic and conventional production; hazelnuts; cost-benefit analysis; net present value; internal rate of return; payback time; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture10090409
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In this study, the economic profitability of hazelnut production in central Italy using conventional and organic farming systems was evaluated using the cost-benefit analysis methodology. Viterbo's province is the leading province in Italy in terms of quantity produced. Three indicators were calculated for both farming systems: net present value, payback time, internal rate of return. The analysis was conducted utilizing primary data collected by means of interviews and surveys with local farmers and organizations of producers. The collected production data refer to the decade 2008-2018; a global area of 100.34 ha and 76.14 ha were considered for conventional and organic cultivation, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was carried out considering different discount rates, price variability, and inflation rates. The net present value is equal to 92,800 euro/ha and to 3778 euro/ha, the payback time is 10.47 years and 42.94 years, while the internal rate of return is 12.2% and 1.1% for the conventional and organic production systems, respectively. The conventional production system performs significantly more remuneratively, considering that the price premium paid by the market for the organic product and the subsidies granted to organic farmers are not sufficient to balance the lower yield.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and organic hazelnuts production systems in Central Italy
    Coppola, Giuseppe
    Costantini, Michele
    Fusi, Alessandra
    Ruiz-Garcia, Luis
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 826
  • [2] Cost-benefit analysis: examples
    Linn, Mott
    BOTTOM LINE, 2011, 24 (01) : 68 - 72
  • [3] Cost-benefit analysis of a regional poison center
    Blizzard, Joseph Charles
    Michels, Jill E.
    Richardson, William H.
    Reeder, Clairborne E.
    Schulz, Richard M.
    Holstege, Christopher P.
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2008, 46 (05) : 450 - 456
  • [4] Review of the application of cost-benefit analysis to the development of production systems in aquaculture
    Samat, Narimah
    Goh, Kim Huat
    See, Kok Fong
    AQUACULTURE, 2024, 587
  • [5] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Wastewater Reuse in Puglia, Southern Italy
    Arborea, Stefania
    Giannoccaro, Giacomo
    de Gennaro, Bernardo C.
    Iacobellis, Vito
    Piccinni, A. Ferruccio
    WATER, 2017, 9 (03):
  • [6] Lost in Taxation The 2019 Cost-Benefit Analysis Debate in Italy
    Massiani, Jerome
    ITALIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2024, 10 (01) : 81 - 124
  • [7] Seismic fragility and cost-benefit analysis of a conventional bridge with retrofit implements
    Montazeri, Maryam
    Amiri, Gholamreza Ghodrati
    Namiranian, Pejman
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 141
  • [8] A Cost-Benefit Analysis for Utility-Scale Agrivoltaic Implementation in Italy
    Di Francia, Girolamo
    Cupo, Paolo
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (07)
  • [9] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [10] Liraglutide: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Schoeffski, O.
    Mentrup, S.
    Lund, N.
    Pfuetzner, A.
    DIABETES STOFFWECHSEL UND HERZ, 2010, 19 (03): : 177 - 184