A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach

被引:171
作者
Nwodo, Martin N. [1 ]
Anumba, Chimay J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Construct Management, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Design Construct & Planning, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Buildings; Sustainability; INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL-QUALITY; ZERO-ENERGY BUILDINGS; ASSESSMENT LCA; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; EMBODIED ENERGY; DYNAMIC LCA; ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; CARBON ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106290
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
There is increasing interest in the study of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of buildings, which entails an estimate of the potential environmental impacts and resource use of buildings. This is driven by increasing awareness of the environmental impact of buildings, as well as the emergence of enabling tools for their assessment. There are review articles on building LCA (see Table 1) but none focuses on the challenges of building LCA, ongoing studies and potential solutions to address the challenges. The aim of this paper is to provide an up-to-date systematic review of life cycle assessment of buildings, and to discuss the major challenges in building LCA, ongoing studies and potential solutions to resolve the identified issues. The methodology involves a detailed literature review to provide an overview of existing studies in building LCA, and a systematic selection and study of review articles/books to investigate the benefits and challenges of building LCA. A summary of the research outputs and recommended further studies on building LCA are outlined in the conclusion section. The major challenges in building LCA were identified as data intensity and quality, subjectivity in environmental impact characterization and valuation, inadequate definition of functional units, assumptions for building life span and service life, lack of procedure for system boundaries, lack of uncertainty analysis, and limitation as a decision-making tool. In addition to discussing ongoing studies to address the issues, this study also proposes research trajectories to resolve the major challenges identified in building LCA.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]   A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry [J].
Abd Rashid, Ahmad Faiz ;
Yusoff, Sumiani .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 45 :244-248
[2]  
Ajayi e.a., 2015, INT J SUSTAINABLE BU, V6, P14, DOI [10.1080/2093761X.2015.1006708, DOI 10.1080/2093761X.2015.1006708]
[3]   Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results [J].
Aktas, Can B. ;
Bilec, Melissa M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (03) :337-349
[4]   Integrated LCA-LEED sustainability assessment model for structure and envelope systems of school buildings [J].
Alshamrani, Othman Subhi ;
Gala, Khaled ;
Alkass, Sabah .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 80 :61-70
[5]   Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review [J].
Anand, Chirjiv Kaur ;
Amor, Ben .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :408-416
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SUSTAINABILITY CONST, P15978
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS
[8]   Integration of life cycle assessment in a BIM environment [J].
Anton, Laura Alvarez ;
Diaz, Joaquin .
CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2014, 2014, 85 :26-32
[9]   Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit: A model using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network and an application [J].
Asadi, Ehsan ;
da Silva, Manuel Gameiro ;
Antunes, Carlos Henggeler ;
Dias, Luis ;
Glicksman, Leon .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 81 :444-456
[10]   On the development of multi-linear regression analysis to assess energy consumption in the early stages of building design [J].
Asadi, Somayeh ;
Amiri, Shideh Shams ;
Mottahedi, Mohammad .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2014, 85 :246-255