Avanafil for male erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:8
作者
Cui, Yuan-Shan [1 ]
Li, Nan [1 ]
Zong, Huan-Tao [1 ]
Yan, Hui-Lei [1 ]
Zhang, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tian Tan Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
avanafil; erectile dysfunction; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trial; DOUBLE-BLIND; PDE5; INHIBITORS; SAFETY; EFFICACY; MULTICENTER; SILDENAFIL; UPDATE; MILD; MEN;
D O I
10.4103/1008-682X.123670
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Avanafil, a potent new selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, has been developed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of this drug for the treatment of ED. A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of avanafil for the treatment of ED. The search included the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The reference lists of the retrieved studies were also investigated. Four publications, involving a total of 1381 patients, were used in the analysis, including four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared avanafil with a placebo. Among the co-primary efficacy end points indicating that avanafil 100 mg was more effective than a placebo were successful vaginal penetration (SEP2) (the odds ratio (OR) =5.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) =3.29-7.78, P < 0.00001) and successful intercourse (SEP3) (OR = 3.99, 95% CI = 2.80-5.67, P < 0.00001). Men randomized to receive avanafil were less likely than those receiving the placebo to drop out due to an adverse event (AE) (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.54-4.08, P = 0.44). Specific AEs with avanafil included headache and flushing, which were significantly less likely to occur with placebo. This meta-analysis indicates that avanafil 100 or 200 mg is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for ED. Compared with avanafil 100 mg, patients who take avanafil 200 mg are more likely to experience headaches.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 477
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Allison M, 2011, J SEX MED, V8, P466
[2]   Future prospects in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: focus on avanafil [J].
Alwaal, Amjad ;
Al-Mannie, Raed ;
Carrier, Serge .
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2011, 5 :435-443
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, STENDRA AV TABL PRES
[4]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[5]   Assessment of the relational factor in male patients consulting for sexual dysfunction: The concept of couple sexual dysfunction [J].
Corona, Giovanni ;
Petrone, Luisa ;
Mannucci, Edoardo ;
Magini, Angela ;
Lotti, Francesco ;
Ricca, Valdo ;
Chiarini, Valerio ;
Forti, Gianni ;
Maggi, Mario .
JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2006, 27 (06) :795-801
[6]   Phosphodiesterase Type 5 (PDE5) Inhibitors in Erectile Dysfunction: The Proper Drug for the Proper Patient [J].
Corona, Giovanni ;
Mondaini, Nicola ;
Ungar, Andrea ;
Razzoli, Elisa ;
Rossi, Andrea ;
Fusco, Ferdinando .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (12) :3418-3432
[7]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]   Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction [J].
Goldstein, I ;
Lue, TF ;
Padma-Nathan, H ;
Rosen, RC ;
Steers, WD ;
Wicker, PA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (20) :1397-1404
[9]   Avanafil for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study in Men With Diabetes Mellitus [J].
Goldstein, Irwin ;
Jones, LeRoy A. ;
Belkoff, Laurence H. ;
Karlin, Gary S. ;
Bowden, Charles H. ;
Peterson, Craig A. ;
Trask, Brenda A. ;
Day, Wesley W. .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 87 (09) :843-852
[10]   A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Avanafil in Subjects with Erectile Dysfunction [J].
Goldstein, Irwin ;
McCullough, Andrew R. ;
Jones, LeRoy A. ;
Hellstrom, Wayne J. ;
Bowden, Charles H. ;
DiDonato, Karen ;
Trask, Brenda ;
Day, Wesley W. .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (04) :1122-1133