When to use the Bonferroni correction

被引:2206
作者
Armstrong, Richard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
关键词
Bonferroni correction; Clinical & Experimental Optometry; Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics; Optometry & Vision Science; statistical guidelines; OPTIC-NERVE HEAD; CONTACT-LENS WEAR; COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; TIME-DOMAIN; REPEATABILITY; ASSOCIATIONS; PERFORMANCE; AGREEMENT; PRESSURE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/opo.12131
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Bonferroni correction adjusts probability (p) values because of the increased risk of a type I error when making multiple statistical tests. The routine use of this test has been criticised as deleterious to sound statistical judgment, testing the wrong hypothesis, and reducing the chance of a type I error but at the expense of a type II error; yet it remains popular in ophthalmic research. The purpose of this article was to survey the use of the Bonferroni correction in research articles published in three optometric journals, viz. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, Optometry & Vision Science, and Clinical & Experimental Optometry, and to provide advice to authors contemplating multiple testing. Recent findings: Some authors ignored the problem of multiple testing while others used the method uncritically with no rationale or discussion. A variety of methods of correcting p values were employed, the Bonferroni method being the single most popular. Bonferroni was used in a variety of circumstances, most commonly to correct the experiment-wise error rate when using multiple 't' tests or as a post-hoc procedure to correct the family-wise error rate following analysis of variance (ANOVA). Some studies quoted adjusted p values incorrectly or gave an erroneous rationale. Summary: Whether or not to use the Bonferroni correction depends on the circumstances of the study. It should not be used routinely and should be considered if: (1) a single test of the 'universal null hypothesis' (Ho) that all tests are not significant is required, (2) it is imperative to avoid a type I error, and (3) a large number of tests are carried out without preplanned hypotheses.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 508
页数:7
相关论文
共 64 条
[51]   Height, weight, body mass index and ocular biometry in patients with sickle cell disease [J].
Osuobeni, Ebi Peter ;
Okpala, Iheanyi ;
Williamson, Tom H. ;
Thomas, Peter .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2009, 29 (02) :189-198
[52]  
Ottenbacher KJ, 1998, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V147, P615
[53]   What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments [J].
Perneger, TV .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7139) :1236-1238
[54]   Survey of German clinical prescribing philosophies for hyperopia [J].
Reiter, Constantin ;
Leising, Daniel ;
Madsen, Ellis M. .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2007, 84 (02) :131-136
[55]   Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia [J].
Richdale, Kathryn ;
Mitchell, G. Lynn ;
Zadnik, Karla .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2006, 83 (05) :266-273
[56]  
Rothman K J, 1990, Epidemiology, V1, P43, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00010
[57]  
Schmidt P, 2010, OPTOMETRY VISION SCI, V87, P96, DOI 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181cc8fb9
[58]   Epidemiology 4 - Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments [J].
Schulz, KF ;
Grimes, DA .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9470) :1591-1595
[59]   Correction for Multiple Testing Is There a Resolution? [J].
Streiner, David L. ;
Norman, Geoffrey R. .
CHEST, 2011, 140 (01) :16-18
[60]   Transient changes of intraocular pressure and anterior segment configuration after diagnostic mydriasis with 1% tropicamide in children [J].
Tsai, I-Lun ;
Tsai, Ching-Yao ;
Kuo, Li-Lin ;
Liou, Shiow-Wen ;
Lin, Shan ;
Wang, I-Jong .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2012, 95 (02) :166-172