Seasonal differences in relationships between changes in spring phenology and dynamics of carbon cycle in grasslands

被引:6
作者
Xie, Zhiying [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Wenquan [1 ,2 ]
Qiao, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Zhan, Pei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Peixian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing Engn Res Ctr Global Land Remote Sensing P, Inst Remote Sensing Sci & Engn, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
来源
ECOSPHERE | 2019年 / 10卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
carbon cycle; FLUXNET; grasslands; green-up; phenology; NET ECOSYSTEM EXCHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DECIDUOUS FOREST; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; PLANT PHENOLOGY; TIME-SERIES; TEMPERATE; RESPONSES; CO2; BUDGET;
D O I
10.1002/ecs2.2733
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Global warming is dramatically altering the plant phenology of terrestrial ecosystem and thus has caused significant effects on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Many studies have investigated the relationships between the spring phenological changes and the dynamics of carbon cycle, but the seasonal differences in these relationships are still unclear. This study used eddy covariance measurements of grassland net ecosystem productivity (NEP) from nine FLUXNET sites (73 site-years of data) to investigate the relationships between the spring phenological changes (i.e., early green-up, EGU; middle green-up, MGU; and late green-up, LGU) and the dynamics of carbon cycle (including NEP; ecosystem respiration, ER; and gross ecosystem production, GEP) at a ten-day scale. Weak relationships were found between the spring phenological changes and the dynamics of ER at all sites. The advance of spring phenology mainly caused significant increases in GEP (or NEP) during the initial 20-50 d after the green-up date at most sites. With an advancement of 1 d in EGU (MGU and LGU), GEP and NEP were increased by 1.5-6.0 (3.5-7.1 and 2.4-4.7) and 0.7-3.6 (1.5-3.9 and 1.9-4.7) g C/m(2) during the early growing season (EGS), respectively. The advance of spring phenology did not have significant impacts on GEP (or NEP) during the middle and late growing season (MGS and LGS) at most sites, but yielded a significant decrease in GEP (or NEP) during MGS at a few sites. As the grasslands turning green, the duration of the impact of the changes in EGU, MGU, and LGU on GEP (or NEP) was reduced, whereas the magnitude of the impact of the changes on the ten-day cumulative GEP (or NEP) was increased at most sites. Thus, there were two possible impact models for the spring phenological changes on the dynamics of carbon cycle for grasslands: The advance of spring phenology only increases the GEP (or NEP) during EGS, and the advance of spring phenology only decreases the GEP (or NEP) during MGS. These results could be helpful in further understanding the influences of spring phenological changes on the dynamics of carbon cycle for grasslands.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Assessment of the nitrogen and carbon budget of two managed temperate grassland fields
    Ammann, Christof
    Spirig, Christoph
    Leifeld, Jens
    Neftel, Albrecht
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 133 (3-4) : 150 - 162
  • [2] Anderson-Teixeira K. J., 2015, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P410
  • [3] Responses of spring phenology to climate change
    Badeck, FW
    Bondeau, A
    Böttcher, K
    Doktor, D
    Lucht, W
    Schaber, J
    Sitch, S
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2004, 162 (02) : 295 - 309
  • [4] PHOTOSYNTHETIC RESPONSE AND ADAPTATION TO TEMPERATURE IN HIGHER-PLANTS
    BERRY, J
    BJORKMAN, O
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1980, 31 : 491 - 543
  • [5] Increased carbon sequestration by a boreal deciduous forest in years with a warm spring
    Black, TA
    Chen, WJ
    Barr, AG
    Arain, MA
    Chen, Z
    Nesic, Z
    Hogg, EH
    Neumann, HH
    Yang, PC
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (09) : 1271 - 1274
  • [6] Earlier springs decrease peak summer productivity in North American boreal forests
    Buermann, Wolfgang
    Bikash, Parida R.
    Jung, Martin
    Burn, Donald H.
    Reichstein, Markus
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [7] Buttlar J. V., 2018, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V15, P1
  • [8] Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions
    Campos, Guillermo E. Ponce
    Moran, M. Susan
    Huete, Alfredo
    Zhang, Yongguang
    Bresloff, Cynthia
    Huxman, Travis E.
    Eamus, Derek
    Bosch, David D.
    Buda, Anthony R.
    Gunter, Stacey A.
    Scalley, Tamara Heartsill
    Kitchen, Stanley G.
    McClaran, Mitchel P.
    McNab, W. Henry
    Montoya, Diane S.
    Morgan, Jack A.
    Peters, Debra P. C.
    Sadler, E. John
    Seyfried, Mark S.
    Starks, Patrick J.
    [J]. NATURE, 2013, 494 (7437) : 349 - 352
  • [9] Effects of plant traits on ecosystem and regional processes: a conceptual framework for predicting the consequences of global change
    Chapin, F. Stuart, III
    [J]. ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2003, 91 (04) : 455 - 463
  • [10] Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe
    Chmielewski, FM
    Rötzer, T
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2001, 108 (02) : 101 - 112