Physiological responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought and waterlogging stresses: dry matter partitioning

被引:6
|
作者
Gonzalez, Juan A. [2 ]
Gallardo, Miriam [2 ]
Hilal, Mirna [1 ]
Rosa, Mariana [1 ]
Prado, Fernando E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fac Ciencias Nat & IML, Catedra Fisiol Vegetal, RA-4000 San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
[2] Fdn Miguel Lillo, Inst Ecol Bot, RA-4000 San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
关键词
Chenopodium quinoa; Chlorophyll; Drought; Dry matter partitioning; Nitrogen; Protein; Soluble carbohydrates; Waterlogging; CHLOROPHYLL-A; GROWTH-RATE; WATER; ROOT; CARBOHYDRATE; ACCLIMATION; TEMPERATURE; PLANT; CAROTENOIDS; METABOLISM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants responded differently to drought and waterlogging. Plant and root dry weights (DW) were lower in both drought and waterlogging conditions than in well-watered conditions, but the lowest values were obtained under waterlogging. However, the root weight ratio (RWR: root dry weight per unit of plant dry weight) did not show significant changes in any treatments. Leaf area (LA) and specific leaf area (SLA) were higher in drought than in waterlogging, but drought and control treatments showed no significant differences. Conversely, specific leaf weight (SLW) and relative water content (RWC) were higher under waterlogging than drought. However, between control and waterlogging conditions, no a significant difference in RWC values emerged. In addition, the number of leaves and height of plants remained unchanged in all treatments. The lowest content of total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b was observed in waterlogging conditions while between control and drought treatments there were no significant differences. Chlorophyll a/b ratio remained unchanged in all treatments. Leaf nitrogen content, expressed per unit of leaf dry weight (N-m), was lower in control plants and remained unchanged under drought and waterlogging conditions. However, when it was expressed per unit of leaf area (N-a), waterlogging produced the highest value. In addition, soluble protein content was also higher in waterlogging than in control and drought conditions. Proline content was higher under drought than in control and waterlogging conditions; however, there was no a significant difference between control and waterlogging treatments. Between control and drought treatments there were no differences in starch, sucrose or fructose contents. Glucose and total soluble sugar contents were higher under drought than in well-watered conditions. However, the highest amounts of soluble sugars and starch were found in waterlogging. Relationships between soil water surplus and quinoa growth are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physiological and Morphological Responses of two Quinoa Cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to Drought Stress
    Ali, Oudou Issa
    Fghire, Rachid
    Anaya, Fatima
    Benlhabib, Ouafae
    Wahbi, Said
    GESUNDE PFLANZEN, 2019, 71 (02): : 123 - 133
  • [2] Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Responses of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to Elicitors Under Drought Stress
    Forouzandeh, Mohamad
    Parsa, Soheil
    Mahmoodi, Sohrab
    Izanloo, Ali
    PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER, 2024, 42 (03) : 515 - 531
  • [3] Physiological and Morphological Responses of two Quinoa Cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to Drought Stress; [Physiologische und morphologische Reaktionen zweier Quinoa-Sorten (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) auf Trockenstress]
    Issa Ali O.
    Fghire R.
    Anaya F.
    Benlhabib O.
    Wahbi S.
    Gesunde Pflanzen, 2019, 71 (2): : 123 - 133
  • [4] Reproductive partitioning in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
    Bertero, H. D.
    Ruiz, R. A.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2010, 118 (01) : 94 - 101
  • [5] Ecdysteroids of Quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Zhu, N
    Kikuzaki, H
    Vastano, BC
    Nakatani, N
    Karwe, MV
    Rosen, RT
    Ho, CT
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2001, 49 (05) : 2576 - 2578
  • [6] The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Jacobsen, SE
    FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (1-2) : 167 - 177
  • [7] Integrating transcriptomics and metabolomics to analyze quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) responses to drought stress and rewatering
    Huan, Xiuju
    Li, Li
    Liu, Yongjiang
    Kong, Zhiyou
    Liu, Yeju
    Wang, Qianchao
    Liu, Junna
    Zhang, Ping
    Guo, Yirui
    Qin, Peng
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [8] Glycaemic properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.).
    Zevallos, V.
    Grimble, G.
    Herencia, L. I.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2006, 65 : 60A - 60A
  • [9] Modelling photoperiod and temperature responses of flowering in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Bertero, HD
    King, RW
    Hall, AJ
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1999, 63 (01) : 19 - 34
  • [10] Distribution of minerals in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds
    Konishi, Y
    Hirano, S
    Tsuboi, H
    Wada, M
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 68 (01) : 231 - 234