Worldwide use of intrauterine contraception: a review

被引:137
|
作者
Buhling, Kai J. [1 ]
Zite, Nikki B. [2 ]
Lotke, Pamela [3 ]
Black, Kirsten [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Gynaecol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Tennessee, Grad Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Univ Sydney, Queen Elizabeth II Res Inst Mothers & Infants, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Health care professional; Intrauterine contraception; Intrauterine device; Utilization; Variability; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; UNITED-STATES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DEVICE INSERTION; NURSE-MIDWIVES; PRACTITIONERS; PROVIDERS; ATTITUDES; DELIVERY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Globally, 14.3% of women of reproductive age use intrauterine contraception (MC), but the distribution of IUC users is strikingly nonuniform. In some countries, the percentage of women using IUC is <2%, whereas in other countries, it is >40%. Reasons for this large variation are not well documented. The aims of this review are to describe the worldwide variation in IUC utilization and to explore factors that impact utilization rates among women of reproductive age in different continents and countries. Study Design: Published literature from 1982 to 2012 was reviewed, using Medline and Embase, to identify publications reporting diverse practices of IUC provision, including variation in the types of IUC available. Local experts who are active members of international advisory groups or congresses were also consulted to document variations in practice regulations, published guidelines and cost of IUC in different countries. Results: Multiple factors appear to contribute to global variability in IUC use, including government policy on family planning, the types of health care providers (HCPs) who are authorized to place and remove IUC, the medicolegal environment, the availability of practical training for HCPs, cost differences and the geographical spread of clinics providing IUC services. Conclusions: Our review shows that the use of IUC is influenced more by factors such as geographic differences, government policy and the HCP's educational level than by medical eligibility criteria. These factors can be influenced through education of HCPs and greater understanding among policy makers of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of IUC methods. Implications: Globally, 14.3% of women of reproductive age use IUC, but the percentage of women using IUC is in some countries <2%, whereas in other countries, it is >40%. This paper reviews the reasons for this diverse and highlights possible starting points to improve the inclusion of IUC in contraceptive counseling. (c) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 173
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception
    d'Arcangues, Catherine
    CONTRACEPTION, 2007, 75 (06) : S2 - S7
  • [2] A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women
    Black, Kirsten
    Lotke, Pamela
    Buhling, Kai J.
    Zite, Nikki B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2012, 17 (05) : 340 - 350
  • [3] Expanding access to intrauterine contraception
    Allen, Rebecca H.
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    Grimes, David A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (05) : 456.e1 - 456.e5
  • [4] A Clinical Review of the Intrauterine Device as an Effective Method of Contraception
    Forthofer, Kimberley V.
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2009, 38 (06): : 693 - 698
  • [5] Intrauterine contraception
    Goeckenjan, Maren
    Seyler, Helga
    GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE, 2024, 22 (03): : 178 - 183
  • [6] Intrauterine Contraception
    Hsia, Jennifer K.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (03) : 175 - 182
  • [7] Increased Use of Intrauterine Contraception in California, 1997 to 2007
    Thompson, Kirsten M. J.
    Foster, Diana Greene
    Harper, Cynthia C.
    WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2011, 21 (06) : 425 - 430
  • [8] A review of intrauterine contraception in the Asia-Pacific region
    Bateson, Deborah
    Kang, Sukho
    Paterson, Helen
    Singh, Kuldip
    CONTRACEPTION, 2017, 95 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [9] Postpartum intrauterine device contraception: A review
    Shadi Rezai
    Pameela Bisram
    Hasan Nezam
    Ray Mercado
    Cassandra E Henderson
    World Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2016, (01) : 134 - 139
  • [10] Intrauterine contraception: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines
    Vidal, F.
    Paret, L.
    Linet, T.
    le Gac, Y. Tanguy
    Guerby, P.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (12): : 806 - 822