The University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model: An Update

被引:39
作者
Alagoz, Oguzhan [1 ]
Ergun, Mehmet Ali [1 ]
Cevik, Mucahit [2 ]
Sprague, Brian L. [3 ,4 ]
Fryback, Dennis G. [5 ]
Gangnon, Ronald E. [5 ,6 ]
Hampton, John M. [5 ,9 ]
Stout, Natasha K. [7 ,8 ]
Trentham-Dietz, Amy [5 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, 3242 Mech Engn Bldg,1513 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Surg, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Ctr Canc, Burlington, VT USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Madison, WI USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Populat Med, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Boston, MA USA
[9] Univ Wisconsin, Carbone Canc Ctr, Madison, WI USA
关键词
breast cancer; incidence; screening; simulation; AGE; 40; YEARS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL PROGRESS; UNITED-STATES; FOLLOW-UP; MORTALITY; WOMEN; RISK; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X17711927
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model (UWBCS), also referred to as Model W, is a discrete-event microsimulation model that uses a systems engineering approach to replicate breast cancer epidemiology in the US over time. This population-based model simulates the lifetimes of individual women through 4 main model components: breast cancer natural history, detection, treatment, and mortality. A key feature of the UWBCS is that, in addition to specifying a population distribution in tumor growth rates, the model allows for heterogeneity in tumor behavior, with some tumors having limited malignant potential (i.e., would never become fatal in a woman's lifetime if left untreated) and some tumors being very aggressive based on metastatic spread early in their onset. The model is calibrated to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) breast cancer incidence and mortality data from 1975 to 2010, and cross-validated against data from the Wisconsin cancer reporting system. The UWBCS model generates detailed outputs including underlying disease states and observed clinical outcomes by age and calendar year, as well as costs, resource usage, and quality of life associated with screening and treatment. The UWBCS has been recently updated to account for differences in breast cancer detection, treatment, and survival by molecular subtypes (defined by ER/HER2 status), to reflect the recent advances in screening and treatment, and to consider a range of breast cancer risk factors, including breast density, race, body-mass-index, and the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Therefore, the model can evaluate novel screening strategies, such as risk-based screening, and can assess breast cancer outcomes by breast cancer molecular subtype. In this article, we describe the most up-to-date version of the UWBCS.
引用
收藏
页码:99S / 111S
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Alagoz O, 2018, MED DECIS MAKING, V38, P3
  • [2] American College of Radiology and BI-RADS Committee, 2013, ACR BIRADS ATLAS BR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, National health and nutrition examination survey
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, National Health Interview Survey
  • [5] Variation in tumor natural history contributes to racial disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis
    Batina, Nataliya G.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Gangnon, Ronald E.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Rosenberg, Marjorie A.
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Fryback, Dennis G.
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 138 (02) : 519 - 528
  • [6] Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer
    Berry, DA
    Cronin, KA
    Plevritis, SK
    Fryback, DG
    Clarke, L
    Zelen, M
    Mandelblatt, JS
    Yakovlev, AY
    Habbema, JDF
    Feuer, EJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) : 1784 - 1792
  • [7] Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
  • [8] Using Active Learning for Speeding up Calibration in Simulation Models
    Cevik, Mucahit
    Ergun, Mehmet Ali
    Stout, Natasha K.
    Trentham-Dietz, Amy
    Craven, Mark
    Alagoz, Oguzhan
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 36 (05) : 581 - 593
  • [9] Bias Associated With Self-Report of Prior Screening Mammography
    Cronin, Kathleen A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Krapcho, Martin
    Yu, Binbing
    Geller, Berta M.
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Onega, Tracy
    Feuer, Eric J.
    Breen, Nancy
    Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (06) : 1699 - 1705
  • [10] Fryback Dennis G, 2006, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P37, DOI 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgj007