Interpretation of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder criteria in self-report surveys may change with age. A longitudinal analysis of young Swiss men

被引:15
作者
Marmet, Simon [1 ]
Studer, Joseph [1 ]
Bertholet, Nicolas [1 ]
Grazioli, Veronique S. [1 ]
Daeppen, Jean-Bernard [1 ]
Gmel, Gerhard [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lausanne Univ Hosp CHUV, Alcohol Treatment Ctr, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Addict Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ West England, Bristol, Avon, England
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Alcohol use disorder; item response theory; emerging adulthood; DSM-5; general population survey; SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; DEPENDENCE CRITERIA; NATIONAL-SURVEY; UNITED-STATES; IV; ABUSE; PREVALENCE; ADOLESCENTS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1080/16066359.2018.1547817
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: General population surveys using self-reported measures show alcohol use disorder (AUD) to be most prevalent in young adulthood, but this may be due to misinterpretations of AUD criteria among inexperienced drinkers. The present study investigated changes in prevalence of criteria during emerging adulthood.Methods: 4924 young Swiss men were followed across three waves (age at wave 1 (w1): 20; w2: 21; w3: 25 years). We measured AUD according to the 11DSM-5 criteria and estimated Item Response Theory models for each wave and differential item functioning across waves, related to the cohort growing older.Results: Endorsement of several AUD criteria varied considerably as a function of age in a period of only five years: Five criteria showed differential item functioning between waves 1 and 3 (i.e. between the age of 20 and 25), including the three most frequently endorsed criteria. Prevalence of tolerance (w1, 57.8%; w3, 29.6%) decreased in relation to the AUD score (Mantel-Haenszel OR=0.26), whereas the use of alcohol larger/longer than intended (w1, 73.7%; w3, 84.8%; OR=1.93) and hazardous use (w1, 62.7%; w3, 68.4%; OR=1.31) increased, resulting in an unchanged mean AUD score and prevalence, but changing combinations of criteria to qualify AUD.Conclusions: Considerable differential item functioning over five years among several of the most endorsed AUD criteria suggests shifts in the interpretation of DSM-5 criteria during emerging adulthood. Self-reported measures of DSM-5 AUD criteria may require reformulation to account for young people's different perceptions and to yield comparable diagnoses over time and across age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 497
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SUCHTMONITORING SCHW
[2]  
Astudillo M, 2017, AMBULANTE SUCHTHILFE
[3]   The trouble with alcohol abuse: what are we trying to measure, diagnose, count and prevent? [J].
Babor, Thomas F. ;
Caetano, Raul .
ADDICTION, 2008, 103 (07) :1057-1059
[4]  
Baker F., 1985, BASICS ITEM RESPONSE
[5]   The identification of alcohol dependence criteria in the general population [J].
Caetano, R .
ADDICTION, 1999, 94 (02) :255-267
[6]   Diagnosis of alcohol dependence in epidemiological surveys: an epidemic of youthful alcohol dependence or a case of measurement error? [J].
Caetano, Raul ;
Babor, Thomas F. .
ADDICTION, 2006, 101 :111-114
[7]   What were they thinking? Adolescents' interpretations of DSM-IV alcohol dependence symptom queries and implications for diagnostic validity [J].
Chung, T ;
Martin, CS .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2005, 80 (02) :191-200
[8]   Assessment of alcohol tolerance in adolescents [J].
Chung, T ;
Martin, CS ;
Winters, KC ;
Langenbucher, JW .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2001, 62 (05) :687-695
[9]  
DSM-5, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
[10]  
Gliem R. R., 2003, MIDW RES PRACT C AD