AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF GABOR REPRESENTATIONS FOR FACE RECOGNITION

被引:15
作者
Amin, M. Ashraful [1 ]
Yan, Hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Elect Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sydney, Hong Kong Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Face recognition; Gabor kernel; tensor representation; principle component analysis; probabilistic neural network; support vector machine; decision tree; DISCRIMINANT-ANALYSIS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; CLASSIFICATION; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1142/S0218001409007181
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper examines the classification capability of different Gabor representations for human face recognition. Usually, Gabor filter responses for eight orientations and five scales for each orientation are calculated and all 40 basic feature vectors are concatenated to assemble the Gabor feature vector. This work explores 70 different Gabor feature vector extraction techniques for face recognition. The main goal is to determine the characteristics of the 40 basic Gabor feature vectors and to devise a faster Gabor feature extraction method. Among all the 40 basic Gabor feature representations the filter responses acquired from the largest scale at smallest relative orientation change (with respect to face) shows the highest discriminating ability for face recognition while classification is performed using three classification methods: probabilistic neural networks (PNN), support vector machines (SVM) and decision trees (DT). A 40 times faster summation based Gabor representation shows about 98% recognition rate while classification is performed using SVM. In this representation all 40 basic Gabor feature vectors are summed to form the summation based Gabor feature vector. In the experiment, a sixth order data tensor containing the basic Gabor feature vectors is constructed, for all the operations.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 431
页数:31
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Amin MA, 2005, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V3613, P484
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CITESEER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MACHINE LEARNING, MCGRAW-HILL SCIENCE/ENGINEERING/MATH
[4]  
BACHMANN T, 1991, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, V3, P87, DOI 10.1080/09541449108406221
[5]   Face recognition by independent component analysis [J].
Bartlett, MS ;
Movellan, JR ;
Sejnowski, TJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2002, 13 (06) :1450-1464
[6]   Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection [J].
Belhumeur, PN ;
Hespanha, JP ;
Kriegman, DJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 19 (07) :711-720
[7]  
Buhmann J., 1990, IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (Cat. No.90CH2879-5), P411, DOI 10.1109/IJCNN.1990.137747
[8]   A tutorial on Support Vector Machines for pattern recognition [J].
Burges, CJC .
DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 1998, 2 (02) :121-167
[9]   HUMAN AND MACHINE RECOGNITION OF FACES - A SURVEY [J].
CHELLAPPA, R ;
WILSON, CL ;
SIROHEY, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1995, 83 (05) :705-740
[10]   EMPATH: A neural network that categorizes facial expressions [J].
Dailey, MN ;
Cottrell, GW ;
Padgett, C ;
Adolphs, R .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 14 (08) :1158-1173