Decision-making, risk and corporate governance: New dynamic models/algorithms and optimization for bankruptcy decisions

被引:11
|
作者
Nwogugu, Michael
机构
[1] Brooklyn, NY 11217
关键词
bankruptcy; optimization; dynamical systems; logic; AI; decision-making; risk; legal reasoning; behavioral analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.140
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Bankruptcy and recovery prediction models are often used in auditing, large corporate transactions (M&A, strategic alliances, etc.), investment decision-making, and in the judicial setting where judges are the final arbiters in the bankruptcy process. However, all existing bankruptcy and recovery models are deficient primarily because: The research methods were flawed. The authors merely imposed rigid mathematical models on the bankruptcy framework. The models do not follow an inter-disciplinary approach and do not consider many of the legal, behavioral/psychological and economic issues in financial distress. The models do not allow for optimization and simulation in order to derive the best conditions for minimizing financial distress - such optimization-based financial distress models can be particularly useful in negotiating debt restructurings, and in bankruptcy courts where judges have to decide the timing and structure of the bankruptcy process and the final result. This article introduces various dynamic models for bankruptcy and recovery decision-making, and develops a framework and foundation for further research in the use of dynamical systems and artificial intelligence in modeling bankruptcy decision-making and legal reasoning. The paper also illustrates the need for more collaboration among researchers in law, business and computer science. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 401
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimization-based decision-making models for disaster recovery and reconstruction planning of transportation networks
    Milad Zamanifar
    Timo Hartmann
    Natural Hazards, 2020, 104 : 1 - 25
  • [32] Optimization-based decision-making models for disaster recovery and reconstruction planning of transportation networks
    Zamanifar, Milad
    Hartmann, Timo
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2020, 104 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [33] The involvement of parents in healthcare decisions where adult children are at risk of lacking decision-making capacity: a qualitative study of treatment decisions in epilepsy
    Redley, M.
    Prince, E.
    Bateman, N.
    Pennington, M.
    Wood, N.
    Croudace, T.
    Ring, H.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2013, 57 (06) : 531 - 538
  • [34] Four new types of soft fuzzy rough covering models and their applications in decision-making
    Khalil, Ahmed Mostafa
    Li, Sheng Gang
    Liu, Heng
    Zhao, Hu
    COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2025, 44 (01):
  • [35] An optimization model for tactical decision-making level and uncertainty risk management in petroleum supply chain
    Zhao Y.
    Luo Y.
    Yuan X.
    Yuan, Xigang (yuanxg@tju.edu.cn), 2017, Materials China (68): : 746 - 758
  • [36] A Risk-Based Dynamic Decision-Making Approach for Cybersecurity Protection in Industrial Control Systems
    Qin, Yuanqing
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhou, Chunjie
    Xiong, Naixue
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2020, 50 (10): : 3863 - 3870
  • [37] Dynamic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Method for Risk-Based Ship Design
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xueqian
    Yuan, Yuchao
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (13):
  • [38] Individual vs. group decision-making: an experiment on dynamic choice under risk and ambiguity
    Carbone, Enrica
    Georgalos, Konstantinos
    Infante, Gerardo
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2019, 87 (01) : 87 - 122
  • [39] Individual vs. group decision-making: an experiment on dynamic choice under risk and ambiguity
    Enrica Carbone
    Konstantinos Georgalos
    Gerardo Infante
    Theory and Decision, 2019, 87 : 87 - 122
  • [40] A New Risk-Based Fuzzy Cognitive Model and Its Application to Decision-Making
    Hamidreza Seiti
    Ashkan Hafezalkotob
    Cognitive Computation, 2020, 12 : 309 - 326