Decision-making, risk and corporate governance: New dynamic models/algorithms and optimization for bankruptcy decisions

被引:11
|
作者
Nwogugu, Michael
机构
[1] Brooklyn, NY 11217
关键词
bankruptcy; optimization; dynamical systems; logic; AI; decision-making; risk; legal reasoning; behavioral analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.140
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Bankruptcy and recovery prediction models are often used in auditing, large corporate transactions (M&A, strategic alliances, etc.), investment decision-making, and in the judicial setting where judges are the final arbiters in the bankruptcy process. However, all existing bankruptcy and recovery models are deficient primarily because: The research methods were flawed. The authors merely imposed rigid mathematical models on the bankruptcy framework. The models do not follow an inter-disciplinary approach and do not consider many of the legal, behavioral/psychological and economic issues in financial distress. The models do not allow for optimization and simulation in order to derive the best conditions for minimizing financial distress - such optimization-based financial distress models can be particularly useful in negotiating debt restructurings, and in bankruptcy courts where judges have to decide the timing and structure of the bankruptcy process and the final result. This article introduces various dynamic models for bankruptcy and recovery decision-making, and develops a framework and foundation for further research in the use of dynamical systems and artificial intelligence in modeling bankruptcy decision-making and legal reasoning. The paper also illustrates the need for more collaboration among researchers in law, business and computer science. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 401
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Implementation of Stochastic Analysis in Corporate Decision-Making Models
    Lu, Jin-Biao
    Liu, Zhi-Jiang
    Tulenty, Dmitry
    Tsvetkova, Liudmila
    Kot, Sebastian
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [3] A New Methodology for Decision-Making in Buildings Energy Optimization
    Masdias-Bonome, Antonio E.
    Orosa, Jose A.
    Vergara, Diego
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (13):
  • [4] Risk Evasion and Decision-Making in Dynamic Investments
    Li Ping
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (16TH), VOLS I AND II, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 1566 - 1573
  • [5] Decision-Making and Risk Sources: Key to Source Governance for Social Stability
    Zhu, Demi
    Cao, Shuai
    CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2020, 5 (01) : 95 - 110
  • [6] Decision-Making and Risk Sources: Key to Source Governance for Social Stability
    Demi Zhu
    Shuai Cao
    Chinese Political Science Review, 2020, 5 : 95 - 110
  • [7] Decision-making from a risk assessment perspective for Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions
    Lee J.
    Prékopa A.
    Computational Management Science, 2015, 12 (2) : 243 - 266
  • [8] DECISION-MAKING PATTERNS IN MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE The contribution of informal and procedural interactions to significant multilevel decisions
    van Popering-Verkerk, Jitske
    van Buuren, Arwin
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 18 (07) : 951 - 971
  • [9] Decision-making models for supply chain risk mitigation: A review
    Rajagopal, Varthini
    Venkatesan, Shanmugam Prasanna
    Goh, Mark
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 113 : 646 - 682
  • [10] Simulation and Optimization Models in a Business Game for Decision-Making in Logistics Processes
    Butzke, Marco Aurelio
    Alberton, Anete
    Visentainer, Jeancarlo
    Garcia, Solimar
    Naas, Irenilza de Alencar
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: INITIATIVES FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2016, 488 : 351 - 359