Election turnout in authoritarian regimes

被引:16
作者
Coma, Ferran Martinez i [1 ]
Morgenbesser, Lee [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Govt & Int Relat, Nathan, Qld, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Authoritarianism; Elections; Participation; Turnout; MACHINE POLITICS; VOTER TURNOUT; ARAB-WORLD; PARTICIPATION; VIOLENCE; DEMOCRACIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102222
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
What explains election turnout in authoritarian regimes? Despite the significant energy, resources, and time ruling parties devote to improving the participation rates of citizens, there exists extraordinary variation both within and across authoritarian regimes. This paper hypothesizes that election turnout is explained by contes-tation, coercion and clientelism. To test this theory, the paper uses an original dataset capturing turnout rates for 548 legislative elections in 108 countries between 1960 and 2011. The resulting empirical analysis confirms these Hypothesis - with one notable exception. Instead of encouraging turnout amongst citizens, clientelism discourages it. This counterintuitive finding occurs because citizens lack the optimum incentives for participation and ruling parties lack effective monitoring strategies of that behavior. The conclusion of the paper addresses its implications for existing theories of authoritarian politics and proposes several avenues for further research on election turnout under authoritarianism.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[31]   Clientelism [J].
Hicken, Allen .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 14, 2011, 14 :289-310
[32]   Which Elections Can Be Lost? [J].
Hyde, Susan D. ;
Marinov, Nikolay .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (02) :191-210
[33]   SOVIET ELECTIONS REVISITED - VOTER ABSTENTION IN NONCOMPETITIVE VOTING [J].
KARKLINS, R .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1986, 80 (02) :449-469
[34]  
Kitschelt H, 2006, PATRONS, CLIENTS, AND POLICIES: PATTERNS OF DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY AND POLITICAL COMPETITION, P1
[35]  
Koch C., 2001, ELECTIONS ASIA PACFI, V1
[36]  
Lago I., 2017, POLITICS, P1
[37]   Elections in Rural China: Competition Without Parties [J].
Landry, Pierre F. ;
Davis, Deborah ;
Wang, Shiru .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2010, 43 (06) :763-790
[38]   The rise of competitive authoritarianism [J].
Levitsky, S ;
Way, LA .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2002, 13 (02) :51-65
[39]  
Levitsky StevenandLucan A Way., 2010, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
[40]  
Lindberg S.I., 2006, Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition, P149