The Double-Edged Sword of Big Data in Organizational and Management Research: A Review of Opportunities and Risks

被引:67
作者
Wenzel, Ramon [1 ]
Van Quaquebeke, Niels [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Business Sch, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[2] Kuhne Logist Univ, Management Dept, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
philosophy of science; research design; field research methods; qualitative research; quantitative research; SIGNIFICANCE TESTS; SCIENCE; TIME; PSYCHOLOGY; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; NEUROSCIENCE; PERSONALITY; INDUSTRIAL; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.1177/1094428117718627
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
While many disciplines embrace the possibilities that Big Data present for advancing scholarship and practice, organizational and management research has yet to realize Big Data's potential. In an effort to chart this newfound territory, we briefly describe the principal drivers and key characteristics of Big Data. We then review a broad range of opportunities and risks that are related to the Big Data paradigm, the data itself, and the associated analytical methods. For each, we provide research ideas and recommendations on how to embrace the potentials or address the concerns. Our assessment shows that Big Data, as a paradigm, can be a double-edged sword, capable of significantly advancing our field but also causing backlash if not utilized properly. Our review seeks to inform individual research practices as well as a broader policy agenda in order to advance organizational and management research as a scientifically rigorous and professionally relevant field.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 591
页数:44
相关论文
共 313 条
[1]   Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis [J].
Acedo, Francisco Jose ;
Barroso, Carmen ;
Casanueva, Cristobal ;
Galan, Jose Luis .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (05) :957-983
[2]   STAR PERFORMERS IN TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
O'Boyle, Ernest, Jr. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (02) :313-350
[3]   eLancing: A review and research agenda for bridging the science-practice gap [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Lawal, Sola O. .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 23 (01) :6-17
[4]   Customer-Centric Science: Reporting Significant Research Results With Rigor, Relevance, and Practical Impact in Mind [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Werner, Steve ;
Abbott, JeAnna Lanza ;
Angert, Cory ;
Park, Joon Hyung ;
Kohlhausen, Donna .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2010, 13 (03) :515-539
[5]   Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods [J].
Aickin, M ;
Gensler, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (05) :726-728
[6]   Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology - Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno's (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America [J].
Aiken, Leona S. ;
West, Stephen G. ;
Millsap, Roger E. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2008, 63 (01) :32-50
[7]  
Altman M., 2015, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, V30, P1967, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2779266, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2779266]
[8]   Time: A new research lens [J].
Ancona, DG ;
Goodman, PS ;
Lawrence, BS ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (04) :645-663
[9]  
Anderson J., 2014, The Internet of Things will thrive by 2025
[10]   When It Comes to Evaluating Psychodynamic Therapy, the Devil Is in the Details [J].
Anestis, Michael D. ;
Anestis, Joye C. ;
Lilienfeld, Scott O. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 66 (02) :149-151