Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention

被引:111
作者
Szalma, JL
Warm, JS
Matthews, G
Dember, WN
Weiler, EM
Meier, A
Eggemeier, FT
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Psychol, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Univ Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1518/hfes.46.2.219.37334
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The workload and stress associated with a 40-min vigilance task were examined under conditions wherein observers monitored an auditory or a visual display for changes in signal duration. Global workload scores fell in the midrange of the NASA Task Load Index, with scores on the Frustration subscale increasing linearly over time. These effects were unrelated to the sensory modality of signals. However, sensory modality was a significant moderator variable for stress. Observers became more stressed over time as indexed by responses to the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire, with evidence of recovery in the auditory but not the visual condition toward the end of the watch. This result and the finding that signal detection accuracy - although equated for difficulty under alerted conditions - favored the auditory mode, indicate that display modality and time on task should be considered carefully in the design of operations requiring sustained attention in order to enhance performance and reduce stress. Actual or potential applications of this research include domains in which monitoring is a crucial part, such as baggage screening, security operations, medical monitoring, and power plant operations.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 233
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
Matthews G, 1999, AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE: CURRENT RESEARCH AND TRENDS, P199
[22]  
Matthews G, 2001, HUM FAC TRANSP, P5
[23]   Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance [J].
Matthews, G ;
Desmond, PA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (02) :659-686
[24]  
Matthews G., 1999, PERSONALITY PSYCHOL, V7, P335, DOI DOI 10.1177/154193120404801107
[25]  
MATTHEWS G, 1998, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 4
[26]  
Matthews G., 2001, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 4, P1377, DOI [DOI 10.1177/154193120104501813, 10.1177/154193120104501813]
[27]   Fundamental Dimensions of Subjective State in Performance Settings: Task Engagement, Distress, and Worry [J].
Matthews, Gerald ;
Campbell, Sian E. ;
Falconer, Shona ;
Joyner, Lucy A. ;
Huggins, Jane ;
Gilliland, Kirby ;
Grier, Rebecca ;
Warm, Joel S. .
EMOTION, 2002, 2 (04) :315-340
[28]  
Maxwell S.E., 2004, Designing experiments and analyzing data, V2nd
[29]  
MAYLEBEN DW, 1998, 3 ANN C AUT HUM PERF
[30]   WHAT ARE PERCEPTUAL REPORTS ABOUT [J].
NATSOULAS, T .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1967, 67 (04) :249-+