Stimulus intensity effects and sequential processing in the passive auditory ERP

被引:12
作者
Barry, Robert J. [1 ]
De Blasio, Frances M.
Rushby, Jacqueline A.
MacDonald, Brett
Fogarty, Jack S.
Cave, Adele E.
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Psychol, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
关键词
Auditory stimulus intensity; Event related potentials (ERPs); Temporal principal components analysis; Sequential processing across the ERP; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY MMN; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENTS-ANALYSIS; EQUIPROBABLE GO/NOGO TASK; ERROR-RELATED NEGATIVITY; LATE POSITIVE COMPLEX; SLOW-WAVE; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; INTRINSIC EEG; P300;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.03.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Auditory stimulus intensity of innocuous tones is generally thought to have a direct effect on the amplitude of ERP components, but these effects have rarely been explored across a wide component range, or in multiple paradigms. Here we investigate component sensitivity to stimulus intensity differences in two studies. Study 1 (N = 36) employed a between-participants paradigm in which repeated trains of standard stimuli were presented as 50 or 80 dB SPL 1000 Hz tones. Study 2 (N = 18) used a within-participant presentation of alternating 60 and 80 dB SPL 1000 Hz tones. Electrode caps with 19 channels (referred to linked ears) generated ERPs covering the first 600 ms of each participant's EEG responses; these were submitted to separate temporal PCAs in each study. A similar series of components was obtained in each study: P1, N1a, N1b, N1c, P2, P3a, P3b, nP3, SW1, and SW2; an N2 was found in Study 2 only. Loud tones in Study 1 produced greater amplitudes in all components except SW1. In Study 2, Loud cf. Soft tones produced smaller P1 and nP3, larger N1 components, P2, and P3a, with no effect on N2, P3b, SW1 or SW2. These results indicate similar sequential processes underlying sensory processing in one- and two-stimulus paradigms, with the later stimulus intensity effects varying with paradigm.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 163
页数:15
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]  
ADLER G, 1989, AUDIOLOGY, V28, P316
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OXFORD HDB EVENT REL, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195374148.013.0120
[3]   Dynamics of narrow-band EEG phase effects in the passive auditory oddball task [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
Rushby, Jacqueline A. ;
Smith, Janette L. ;
Clarke, Adam R. ;
Croft, Rodney J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 24 (01) :291-304
[4]  
Barry Robert J., 2020, Journal of Caffeine and Adenosine Research, V10, P71, DOI 10.1089/caff.2019.0021
[5]   Components in the P300:Don't forget the Novelty P3! [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
Steiner, Genevieve Z. ;
De Blasio, Frances M. ;
Fogarty, Jack S. ;
Karamacoska, Diana ;
MacDonald, Brett .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 57 (07)
[6]   Caffeine affects children's ERPs and performance in an equiprobable go/no-go task: Testing a processing schema [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
De Blasio, Frances M. ;
Fogarty, Jack S. .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (05)
[7]   A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
De Blasio, Frances M. ;
Fogarty, Jack S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 123 :74-79
[8]   Reinstating the Novelty P3 [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
Steiner, Genevieve Z. ;
De Blasio, Frances M. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
[9]   ERP Go/NoGo condition effects are better detected with separate PCAs [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
De Blasio, Frances M. ;
Fogarty, Jack S. ;
Karamacoska, Diana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 106 :50-64
[10]   Sequential processing in young and older adults in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
De Blasio, Frances M. ;
Cave, Adele E. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 127 (05) :2273-2285