Behavioural adaptation and effectiveness of a Forward Collision Warning System depending on a secondary cognitive task

被引:22
作者
Bueno, Mercedes [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fabrigoule, Colette [3 ]
Ndiaye, Daniel [4 ]
Fort, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IFSTTAR TS2 LESCOT, F-69675 Bron, France
[2] Univ Lyon, F-69622 Lyon, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux Segalen, CNRS, USR SANPSY 3413, CHU Pellegrin, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[4] Univ Paris Est, IFSTTAR, COSYS, LEPSIS, F-77447 Marne La Vallee, France
关键词
Driving simulator; Forward Collision Warning System; Behavioural adaptation; Distraction; Cognitive load; Attentional resources; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; AVOIDANCE; DISTRACTION; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATOR; BRAKING; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.012
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Forward Collision Warning Systems (FCWS) have been designed to enhance road safety by reducing the number of rear-end collisions. Nevertheless, little is known about how drivers adapt their behaviour over time when using this kind of system. In addition, these systems are expected to aid particularly distracted drivers. However, previous research has suggested that the effectiveness of the system could depend on the difficulty level of the secondary task. The objective of this study on driving simulator was twofold. Firstly, it consisted in evaluating the behavioural adaptation to an FCWS as well as analysing the possible consequences of driving without the system after a short period of adaptation. Secondly, it was to evaluate the effectiveness of the system according to two different difficulty levels of a cognitive secondary task. The results showed that drivers adapted their behaviour positively when the system was introduced. Nevertheless, both the effectiveness and the behavioural adaptation in the short term were dependent on the cognitive load induced by the secondary task. These findings suggest that the warning needs some attentional resources to be processed. Finally, no negative or transfer effect was observed following the removal of the system after a short period of adaptation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 168
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems [J].
Abe, Genya ;
Richardson, John .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2006, 37 (05) :577-586
[2]  
[Anonymous], 15623 ISO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1980, Attention and Performance
[5]   Effects of forward collision warning and repeated event exposure on emergency braking [J].
Aust, Mikael Ljung ;
Engstrom, Johan ;
Vistrom, Matias .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 18 :34-46
[6]   Exploring the central executive [J].
Baddeley, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (01) :5-28
[7]   Effects of an in-vehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance [J].
Ben-Yaacov, A ;
Maltz, M ;
Shinar, D .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2002, 44 (02) :335-342
[8]   Effectiveness of a Forward Collision Warning System in simple and in dual task from an electrophysiological perspective [J].
Bueno, Mercedes ;
Fort, Alexandra ;
Francois, Mathilde ;
Ndiaye, Daniel ;
Deleurence, Philippe ;
Fabrigoule, Colette .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2013, 541 :219-223
[9]   An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task [J].
Bueno, Mercedes ;
Fabrigoule, Colette ;
Deleurence, Philippe ;
Ndiaye, Daniel ;
Fort, Alexandra .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2012, 1470 :69-79
[10]  
Comte S.L., 2000, TRANSPORT RES, V3, P95, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1369-8478(00)00019-X