Correlation of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations determined by LC-MS-MS in oral fluid and plasma from impaired drivers and evaluation of the on-site Drager DrugTest®

被引:59
作者
Laloup, Marleen
Fernandez, Maria del Mar Ramirez
Wood, Michelle
De Boeck, Gert
Maes, Viviane
Samyn, Nele
机构
[1] Natl Inst Criminalist & Criminol, Sect Toxicol, Fed Publ Serv Justice, B-1120 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Waters Corp, MS Technol Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Free Univ Brussels, Acad Hosp, Dept Clin Chem Toxicol, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
oral fluid; plasma; THC; driving under the influence; roadside drug test;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.03.033
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Oral fluid (collected with the Intercept((R) device) and plasma samples were obtained from 139 individuals suspected of driving under the influence of drugs and analyzed for Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the major psychoactive constituent of cannabis, using a validated quantitative LC-MS-MS method. The first aim of the study was to investigate the correlation between the analytical data obtained in the plasma and oral fluid samples, to evaluate the use of oral fluid as a 'predictor' of actual cannabis influence. The results of the study indicated a good accuracy when comparing THC detection in oral fluid and plasma (84.9-95.7% depending on the cut-off used for plasma analysis). ROC curve analysis was subsequently used to determine the optimal cut-off value for THC in oral fluid with plasma as reference sample, in order to 'predict' a positive plasma result for THC. When using the LOQ of the method for plasma (0.5 ng/mL), the optimal cut-off was 1.2 ng/mL THC in oral fluid (sensitivity, 94.7%; specificity, 92.0%). When using the legal cut-off in Belgium for driving under the influence in plasma (2 ng/mL), an optimal cut-off value of 5.2 ng/mL THC in oral fluid (sensitivity, 91.6%; specificity, 88.6%) was observed. In the second part of the study, the performance of the on-site Drager DrugTest (R) for the screening of THC in oral fluid during roadside controls was assessed by comparison with the corresponding LC-MS-MS results in plasma and oral fluid. Since the accuracy was always less than 66%, we do not recommend this Drager DrugTest (R) system for the on-site screening of THC in oral fluid. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 179
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bonfiglio R, 1999, RAPID COMMUN MASS SP, V13, P1175, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19990630)13:12<1175::AID-RCM639>3.3.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]   Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse:: Positive prevalence rates by Intercept™ immunoassay screening and GC-MS-MS confirmation and suggested cutoff concentrations [J].
Cone, EJ ;
Presley, L ;
Lehrer, M ;
Seiter, W ;
Smith, M ;
Kardos, KW ;
Fritch, D ;
Salamone, S ;
Niedbala, RS .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2002, 26 (08) :541-546
[4]   An evaluation of selected oral fluid point-of-collection drug-testing devices [J].
Crouch, DJ ;
Walsh, JM ;
Flegel, R ;
Cangianelli, L ;
Baudys, J ;
Atkins, R .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 29 (04) :244-248
[5]   The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes [J].
Drummer, OH ;
Gerostamoulos, J ;
Batziris, H ;
Chu, M ;
Caplehorn, J ;
Robertson, MD ;
Swann, P .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2004, 36 (02) :239-248
[6]   Relationship of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations in oral fluid and plasma after controlled administration of smoked cannabis [J].
Huestis, MA ;
Cone, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 28 (06) :394-399
[7]   Detection of cannabis use in drivers with the drugwipe device and by GC-MS after Intercept® device collection [J].
Kintz, P ;
Bernhard, W ;
Villain, M ;
Gasser, M ;
Aebi, B ;
Cirimele, V .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 29 (07) :724-727
[8]   Quantitative analysis of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in preserved oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Laloup, M ;
Fernandez, MDR ;
Wood, M ;
De Boeck, G ;
Henquet, U ;
Maes, V ;
Samyn, N .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1082 (01) :15-24
[9]   Detection of marijuana use by oral fluid and urine analysis following single-dose administration of smoked and oral marijuana [J].
Niedbala, RS ;
Kardos, KW ;
Fritch, DF ;
Kardos, S ;
Fries, T ;
Waga, J ;
Robb, J ;
Cone, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 25 (05) :289-303
[10]  
Ramaekers JG, 2000, HUM PSYCHOPHARM CLIN, V15, P551, DOI 10.1002/1099-1077(200010)15:7<551::AID-HUP236>3.0.CO