Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Positive Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery

被引:5
作者
Zhao, Rong [1 ]
Xing, Jun [1 ]
Gao, Jinnan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Shanxi Bethune Hosp, Tongji Shanxi Hosp, Shanxi Acad Med Sci,Hosp 3,Dept Breast Surg, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
关键词
breast cancer; breast-conserving surgery; excision margin; nomogram; decision making; ONCOLOGY CONSENSUS GUIDELINE; AMERICAN SOCIETY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; RESECTION MARGINS; STAGES I; CANCER; IRRADIATION; MANAGEMENT; NOMOGRAM; THERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.875665
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe chances of second surgery due to positive margins in patients receiving breast-conversing surgery (BCS) were about 20-40%. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the status of breast-conserving margins. MethodsThe database identified patients with core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast carcinoma who underwent BCS in Shanxi Bethune Hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021 (n = 573). The patients were divided into two models: (1) The first model consists of 398 patients who underwent BCS between 2015 and 2019; (2) The validation model consists of 175 patients who underwent BCS between 2020 and 2021. The development of the nomogram was based on the findings of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Discrimination was assessed by computing the C-index. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to validate the calibration performance. ResultsThe final multivariate regression model was developed as a nomogram, including blood flow signals (OR = 2.88, p = 0.001), grade (OR = 2.46, p = 0.002), microcalcifications (OR = 2.39, p = 0.003), tumor size in ultrasound (OR = 2.12, p = 0.011) and cerbB-2 status (OR = 1.99, p = 0.042). C-indices were calculated of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.59-0.78) for the modeling and the validation group, respectively. The calibration of the model was considered adequate in the validation group (p > 0.05). ConclusionWe developed a nomogram that enables the estimation of the preoperative risk of positive BCS margins. Our nomogram provides a valuable tool for identifying high-risk patients who might have to undergo a wider excision.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Core Biopsy in the Management of Breast Cancer: A Series of 542 Patients
    Richter-Ehrenstein, Christiane
    Mueller, Sylvia
    Noske, Aurelia
    Schneider, Achim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 17 (04) : 323 - 326
  • [22] Assessment and Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Imaging Modalities and Future Perspectives
    Romeo, Valeria
    Accardo, Giuseppe
    Perillo, Teresa
    Basso, Luca
    Garbino, Nunzia
    Nicolai, Emanuele
    Maurea, Simone
    Salvatore, Marco
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [23] Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery
    Shin, Hee-Chul
    Han, Wonshik
    Moon, Hyeong-Gon
    Cho, Nariya
    Moon, Woo Kyung
    Park, In-Ae
    Park, Sung Jun
    Noh, Dong-Young
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 134 (03) : 1115 - 1123
  • [24] Diagnostic Accuracy of Intraoperative Techniques for Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer Surgery A Meta-analysis
    St John, Edward Robert
    Al-Khudairi, Rashed
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Takats, Zoltan
    Hadjiminas, Dimitri John
    Darzi, Ara
    Leff, Daniel Richard
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (02) : 300 - 310
  • [25] Effect of Intraoperative Imprint Cytology Followed by Frozen Section on Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Tamanuki, Tamaki
    Namura, Maki
    Aoyagi, Tomoyoshi
    Shimizu, Sinichirou
    Suwa, Tomoko
    Matsuzaki, Hiroshi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 1338 - 1346
  • [26] Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland
    Tang, Sarah Shuk-Kay
    Kaptanis, Sarantos
    Haddow, James B.
    Mondani, Giuseppina
    Elsberger, Beatrix
    Tasoulis, Marios Konstantinos
    Obondo, Christine
    Johns, Neil
    Ismail, Wisam
    Syed, Asim
    Kissias, Panayioti
    Venn, Mary
    Sundaramoorthy, Souganthy
    Irwin, Gareth
    Sami, Amtul S.
    Elfadl, Dalia
    Baggaley, Alice
    Remoundos, Dionysios Dennis
    Langlands, Fiona
    Charalampoudis, Petros
    Barber, Zoe
    Hamilton-Burke, Werbena L. S.
    Khan, Ayesha
    Sirianni, Chiara
    Merker, Louise Anne-Marie Grant
    Saha, Sunita
    Lane, Risha Arun
    Chopra, Sharat
    Dupre, Sophie
    Manning, Aidan T.
    St John, Edward R.
    Musbahi, Aya
    Dlamini, Nokwanda
    McArdle, Caitlin L.
    Wright, Chloe
    Murphy, James O.
    Aggarwal, Ravi
    Dordea, Matei
    Bosch, Karen
    Egbeare, Donna
    Osman, Hisham
    Tayeh, Salim
    Razi, Faraz
    Iqbal, Javeria
    Ledwidge, Serena F. C.
    Albert, Vanessa
    Masannat, Yazan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 84 : 315 - 324
  • [27] Intraoperative Assessment of Margins in Breast Conservative Surgery-Still in Use?
    Thill, Marc
    Baumann, Kristin
    Barinoff, Jana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 110 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [28] Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression
    Vittinghoff, Eric
    McCulloch, Charles E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 165 (06) : 710 - 718
  • [29] PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies
    Wolff, Robert F.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Riley, Richard D.
    Whiting, Penny F.
    Westwood, Marie
    Collins, Gary S.
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Mallett, Sue
    Altman, Doug
    Bossuyt, Patrick
    Cook, Nancy R.
    D'Amico, Gennaro
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    Deeks, Jon
    de Groot, Joris
    di Angelantonio, Emanuele
    Fahey, Tom
    Harrell, Frank
    Hayden, Jill A.
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Hyde, Chris
    Ioannidis, John
    Iorio, Alfonso
    Kaptoge, Stephen
    Knottnerus, Andre
    Leeflang, Mariska
    Nixon, Frances
    Perel, Pablo
    Phillips, Bob
    Raatz, Heike
    Riemsma, Rob
    Rovers, Maroeska
    Rutjes, Anne W. S.
    Sauerbrei, Willi
    Sauerland, Stefan
    Scheibler, Fueloep
    Scholten, Rob
    Schuit, Ewoud
    Steyerberg, Ewout
    Tan, Toni
    ter Riet, Gerben
    van der Windt, Danielle
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Vickers, Andrew
    Wood, Angela M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 170 (01) : 51 - +
  • [30] Perpendicular inked versus tangential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: Does the method matter?
    Wright, Mary Jo
    Park, Julia
    Fey, Jane V.
    Park, Anna
    O'Neill, Anne
    Tan, Lee K.
    Borgen, Patrick I.
    Cody, Hiram S., III
    Van Zee, Kimberly J.
    King, Tari A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (04) : 541 - 549