The antecedents of safety leadership: The job demands-resources model

被引:42
作者
Cheung, Clara Man [1 ]
Zhang, Rita Peihua [2 ]
Cui, Qingbin [3 ]
Hsu, Shu-Chien [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Engn, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct & Project Management, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Safety leadership; Job demands-resources model; Psychological capital; Structural equation modeling; Work engagement; Construction safety; COMMON METHOD VARIANCE; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; WORK ENGAGEMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE; SATISFACTION; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104979
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Although research has shown that safety leadership is a strong predictor of safety outcomes, it is unclear what factors lead to safety leadership. This unexplored area has hindered the development of effective interventions to promote safety leadership. This study addresses the knowledge gap by examining how job characteristics and personal resources influence construction leaders' engagement in safety leadership based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model in positive psychology. An online survey was distributed to all managerial employees in a large U.S. construction organization, resulting in 383 valid responses. The structural equation modeling analysis indicates that job characteristics (social support, work autonomy and risk perception) and personal resources (psychological capital) significantly contribute to safety-specific transformational leadership through work engagement. Moreover, psychological capital moderates the effect of social support on leaders' engagement in safety leadership. The implications of the present findings regarding safety leadership research are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
[61]  
Occupational Safety and Health Administration Ministry of Labor, 2020, New Jersey General and Permanent Statutes
[62]  
PAVETT CM, 1983, ACAD MANAGE J, V26, P170, DOI 10.5465/256144
[63]   Hazard recognition and risk perception in construction [J].
Perlman, Amotz ;
Sacks, Rafael ;
Barak, Ronen .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2014, 64 :22-31
[64]  
PODSAKOFF PM, 1982, ACAD MANAGE J, V25, P810, DOI 10.5465/256100
[65]   Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? [J].
Porter, Lyman W. ;
McLaughlin, Grace B. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2006, 17 (06) :559-576
[66]   Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors [J].
Rimal, RN ;
Real, K .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2003, 29 (03) :370-399
[67]  
Rodríguez-Garzón Ignacio, 2015, Rev.fac.ing.univ. Antioquia, P165
[68]   A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour [J].
Salanova, M. ;
Schaufeli, W. B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2008, 19 (01) :116-131
[69]   Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study [J].
Schaufeli, WB ;
Bakker, AB .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (03) :293-315
[70]   The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire - A cross-national study [J].
Schaufeli, Wilmar B. ;
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Salanova, Marisa .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 66 (04) :701-716