Biocapacity optimization in regional planning

被引:54
作者
Guo, Jianjun [1 ,2 ]
Yue, Dongxia [1 ,2 ]
Li, Kai [1 ]
Hui, Cang [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Minist Educ, Key Lab Western Chinas Environm Syst, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Math Sci, Ctr Invas Biol, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
[4] African Inst Math Sci, Math Biosci Grp, ZA-7945 Cape Town, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
LAND-USE CHANGE; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; SCENARIOS; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; INCENTIVES; SIMULATION; MANAGEMENT; CAPACITY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1038/srep41150
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Ecological overshoot has been accelerating across the globe. Optimizing biocapacity has become a key to resolve the overshoot of ecological demand in regional sustainable development. However, most literature has focused on reducing ecological footprint but ignores the potential of spatial optimization of biocapacity through regional planning of land use. Here we develop a spatial probability model and present four scenarios for optimizing biocapacity of a river basin in Northwest China. The potential of enhanced biocapacity and its effects on ecological overshoot and water consumption in the region were explored. Two scenarios with no restrictions on croplands and water use reduced the overshoot by 29 to 53%, and another two scenarios which do not allow croplands and water use to increase worsened the overshoot by 11 to 15%. More spatially flexible transition rules of land use led to higher magnitude of change after optimization. However, biocapacity optimization required a large amount of additional water resources, casting considerable pressure on the already water-scarce socio-ecological system. Our results highlight the potential for policy makers to manage/optimize regional land use which addresses ecological overshoot. Investigation on the feasibility of such spatial optimization complies with the forward-looking policies for sustainable development and deserves further attention.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[31]  
Lieth H., 1975, PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-80913-2_12
[32]   Financing rural renewable energy: A comparison between China and India [J].
Liming, Huang .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (05) :1096-1103
[33]   Ecological Footprint: Informative and evolving - A response to van den Bergh and Grazi (2014) [J].
Lin, David ;
Wackernagel, Mathis ;
Galli, Alessandro ;
Kelly, Ronna .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 58 :464-468
[34]   Future land-use change scenarios for the Black Sea catchment [J].
Mancosu, E. ;
Gago-Silva, A. ;
Barbosa, A. ;
de Bono, A. ;
Ivanov, E. ;
Lehmann, A. ;
Fons, J. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 46 :26-36
[35]   Biocapacity vs Ecological Footprint of world regions: A geopolitical interpretation [J].
Niccolucci, V. ;
Tiezzi, E. ;
Pulselli, F. M. ;
Capineri, C. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 16 :23-30
[36]  
Odum HT., 1996, Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental decision making
[37]   Markov CA, Multi Regression, and Multiple Decision Making for Modeling Historical Changes in Kirkuk City, Iraq [J].
Omar, Najat Qader ;
Ahamad, Mohd Sanusi S. ;
Hussin, Wan Muhd Aminuddin Wan ;
Samat, Narimah ;
Ahmad, Siti Zubaidah Binti .
JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 42 (01) :165-178
[38]  
Rees W. E., 1994, ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT, P362
[39]  
Rees WE., 1992, Environment and Urbanization, V4, P121, DOI DOI 10.1177/095624789200400212
[40]  
Rees WilliamE., 2006, Renewables-Based Technology: Sustainability Assessment, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1002/0470022442.CH9., 10.1002/0470022442.ch9]