The influence of scale structure and sex on parental reports of children's social (pragmatic) communication symptoms

被引:19
作者
Ash, Andrea C. [1 ]
Redmond, Sean M. [1 ]
Timler, Geralyn R. [2 ]
Kean, Jacob [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 390 South 1530 East,Suite 1201, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] James Madison Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Salt Lake VA Hlth Care Syst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
Assessment; factor analysis; language disorders; sex differences; social (pragmatic) communication disorder; EXPLORATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS; SCHOOL-AGE-CHILDREN; LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CHECKLIST CCC; BEHAVIOR; SKILLS; INATTENTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1080/02699206.2016.1257655
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The addition of social (pragmatic) communication disorder [S(P)CD] to the DSM-5 taxonomy has left clinicians and researchers searching for appropriate diagnostic measures. Factor analysis procedures examined the extent to which S(P)CD symptoms presented within the Children's Communication Checklist-Second Edition (CCC-2) represented a unique construct and whether these factors were influenced by children's sex. Parents of 208 children (males = 125 and females = 83) from a community-based sample completed the CCC-2. Two pragmatic scores from the CCC-2 were analysed as follows: the social interaction difference index (SIDI) and a pragmatic composite from the original CCC (PC-5). Factor analysis failed to find a unique factor structure for either pragmatic composite. Analyses uncovered different factor structures for the CCC-2 SIDI and PC-5 composites and for boys and girls. S(P)CD represents a complex combination of symptoms that are poorly differentiated from other language and socioemotional behavioural difficulties.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 312
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[51]  
Semel E., 2003, Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-4th edition, V4th ed.
[52]   Eligibility criteria for language impairment: Is the low end of normal always appropriate? [J].
Spaulding, TJ ;
Plante, E ;
Farinella, KA .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2006, 37 (01) :61-72
[53]   Social (pragmatic) communication disorder: a research review of this new DSM-5 diagnostic category [J].
Swineford, Lauren B. ;
Thurm, Audrey ;
Baird, Gillian ;
Wetherby, Amy M. ;
Swedo, Susan .
JOURNAL OF NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2014, 6
[54]   Use of the Children's Communication Checklist-2 for Classification of Language Impairment Risk in Young School-Age Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder [J].
Timler, Geralyn R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2014, 23 (01) :73-83
[55]  
Tomblin J B., 2014, Understanding individual differences in language development across the school years, P47
[56]   Measuring Pragmatic Language in Speakers With Autism Spectrum Disorders: Comparing the Children's Communication Checklist-2 and the Test of Pragmatic Language [J].
Volden, Joanne ;
Phillips, Linda .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2010, 19 (03) :204-212