Incorporating bioenergy into sustainable landscape designs

被引:65
作者
Dale, Virginia H. [1 ]
Kline, Keith L. [1 ]
Buford, Marilyn A. [2 ]
Volk, Timothy A. [3 ]
Smith, C. Tattersall [4 ]
Stupak, Inge [5 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Ctr Bioenergy Sustainabil, POB 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] US Forest Serv Res & Dev, Washington, DC 20250 USA
[3] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Adaptive management; Biofuel; Planning; Resource management; Scale; Stakeholder; AGRICULTURAL RESIDUE REMOVAL; DECISION-SUPPORT TOOL; SUPPLY CHAIN; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; BIOMASS; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; OPTIMIZATION; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.038
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper describes an approach to landscape design that focuses on integrating bioenergy production with other components of environmental, social and economic systems. Landscape design as used here refers to a spatially explicit, collaborative plan for management of landscapes and supply chains. Landscape design can involve multiple scales and build on existing practices to reduce costs or enhance services. Appropriately applied to a specific context, landscape design can help people assess trade-offs when making choices about locations, types of feedstock, transport, refining and distribution of bioenergy products and services. The approach includes performance monitoring and reporting along the bioenergy supply chain. Examples of landscape design applied to bioenergy production systems are presented. Barriers to implementation of landscape design include high costs, the need to consider diverse land-management objectives from a wide array of stakeholders, up-front planning requirements, and the complexity and level of effort needed for successful stakeholder involvement. A landscape design process may be stymied by insufficient data or participation. An impetus for coordination is critical, and incentives may be required to engage landowners and the private sector. Hence devising and implementing landscape designs for more sustainable outcomes require clear communication of environmental, social, and economic opportunities and concerns. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1171
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Microalgae for Advanced Wastewater Treatment and Sustainable Bioenergy Generation
    Hwang, Jae-Hoon
    Church, Jared
    Lee, Seung-Jin
    Park, Jungsu
    Lee, Woo Hyoung
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2016, 33 (11) : 882 - 897
  • [22] Contribution of Biomass Supply Chains for Bioenergy to Sustainable Development Goals
    Blair, M. Jean
    Gagnon, Bruno
    Klain, Andrew
    Kulisic, Biljana
    LAND, 2021, 10 (02) : 1 - 28
  • [23] Opportunities and Challenges for Integrating Bioenergy into Sustainable Forest Management Certification Programs
    Gan, Jianbang
    Cashore, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2013, 111 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [24] The role of sustainable bioenergy in a fully decarbonised society
    Lund, Henrik
    Skov, Iva Ridjan
    Thellufsen, Jakob Zinck
    Sorknaes, Peter
    Korberg, Andrei David
    Chang, Miguel
    Mathiesen, Brian Vad
    Kany, Mikkel Strunge
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 196 : 195 - 203
  • [25] Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge
    Karp, Angela
    Shield, Ian
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2008, 179 (01) : 15 - 32
  • [26] Sustainable bioenergy production strategies for rural India
    Rahul B. Hiremath
    Bimlesh Kumar
    P. Balachandra
    N. H. Ravindranath
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2010, 15 : 571 - 590
  • [27] Assessing the potential of wildfires as a sustainable bioenergy opportunity
    Veron, Santiago R.
    Jobbagy, Esteban G.
    Di Bella, Carlos M.
    Paruelo, Jose M.
    Jackson, Robert B.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2012, 4 (06): : 634 - 641
  • [28] SUSTAINABLE BIOENERGY POLICY FOR THE PERIOD AFTER 2020
    Supin, Mikulas
    Loucanova, Erika
    Olsiakova, Miriam
    DIGITALISATION AND CIRCULAR ECONOMY: FORESTRY AND FORESTRY BASED INDUSTRY IMPLICATIONS, 2019, : 315 - 320
  • [29] Sustainable rural bioenergy production for developing countries
    Demirbas, Ayhan
    Demirbas, Burak
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2016, 38 (24) : 3578 - 3585
  • [30] Integrating the sustainable energy portfolio: a bioenergy perspective
    Campbell, J. Elliott
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2010, 1 (01) : 15 - 17