Verification of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model when Forecasting Daily Surface Conditions in Southern Alberta

被引:7
作者
Pennelly, Clark [1 ]
Reuter, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
WRF; forecast verification; Alberta; surface forecast; precipitation verification; model bias; wind; verification; PRECIPITATION FORECASTS; WRF MODEL; HEAVY PRECIPITATION; PACIFIC-NORTHWEST; PART I; MM5; PARAMETERIZATION; SIMULATIONS; SCHEMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/07055900.2017.1282345
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model was compared with daily surface observations to verify the accuracy of the WRF model in forecasting surface temperature, pressure, precipitation, wind speed, and direction. Daily forecasts for the following two days were produced at nine locations across southern Alberta, Canada. Model output was verified using station observations to determine the differences in forecast accuracy for each season. Although there were seasonal differences in the WRF model, the summer season forecasts generally had the greatest accuracy, determined by the lowest root mean square errors, whereas the winter season forecasts were the least accurate. The WRF model generally produced skillful forecasts throughout the year although with a smaller diurnal temperature range than observed. The WRF model forecast the prevailing wind direction more accurately than other directions, but it tended to slightly overestimate precipitation amounts. A sensitivity analysis consisting of three microphysics schemes showed relatively minor differences between simulated precipitation as well as 2 m surface temperatures.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 41
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, DEV TERACOMPUTING P
  • [2] BLACK TL, 1994, WEATHER FORECAST, V9, P265, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0265:TNNMEM>2.0.CO
  • [3] 2
  • [4] Evaluation of surface sensible weather forecasts by the WRF and the Eta Models over the western United States
    Cheng, WYY
    Steenburgh, WJ
    [J]. WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2005, 20 (05) : 812 - 821
  • [5] Cherubini T, 2002, WEATHER FORECAST, V17, P238, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0238:VOPFOT>2.0.CO
  • [6] 2
  • [7] Neighborhood-Based Verification of Precipitation Forecasts from Convection-Allowing NCAR WRF Model Simulations and the Operational NAM
    Clark, Adam J.
    Gallus, William A., Jr.
    Weisman, Morris L.
    [J]. WEATHER AND FORECASTING, 2010, 25 (05) : 1495 - 1509
  • [8] Colle BA, 1999, WEATHER FORECAST, V14, P137, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<0137:EOMAEP>2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Colle BA, 2003, WEATHER FORECAST, V18, P458, DOI 10.1175/1520-0434(2003)18<458:MVOTMP>2.0.CO