En Bloc Resections in the Spine: The Experience of 220 Patients During 25 Years

被引:59
|
作者
Boriani, Stefano [1 ]
Gasbarrini, Alessandro [1 ]
Bandiera, Stefano [1 ]
Ghermandi, Riccardo [1 ]
Lador, Ran [2 ]
机构
[1] Rizzoli Inst, Unit Oncol Spine Surg, Dept Oncol & Degenerat Spine Surg, Bologna, Italy
[2] Tel Aviv Med Ctr & Sch Med, Unit Spine Surg, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
En bloc resection; Morbidity; Spine tumors; Surgical planning; MULTILEVEL CERVICAL CHORDOMA; MALIGNANT VERTEBRAL TUMORS; MOBILE SPINE; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; METASTATIC-DISEASE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; BONE-TUMORS; SPONDYLECTOMY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.086
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: En bloc resections aim at surgically removing a tumor in a single, intact piece. Approach must be planned for the complete removal of the tumor without violation of its margins. The shared knowledge of the morbidity, mortality, risk assessment for local disease recurrence, complications, and death, related to spine tumors excised en bloc could improve the treating physician's apprehension of the diseases and decision making process before, during, and after surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to review and report the experience gained during 25 years in one of the world's biggest spine oncologic centers. METHODS: A retrospective study of prospective collected data of 1681 patients affected by spine tumors, of whom 220 had en bloc resections performed. RESULTS: Most tumors were primary-165 cases (43 benign and 122 malignant); metastases occurred in 55 patients. A total of 60 patients died from the disease and 33 local recurrences were recorded. A total of 153 complications were observed in 100 of 216 patients (46.2%); 64 of these patients (30%) suffered 1 complication, whereas the rest had 2 or more. All complications were categorized according to temporal distribution and severity. These were further divided into 7 groups according to the type of complication. There were 105 major and 48 minor complications. Seven patients (4.6%) died as a result of complications. There were 33 local recurrences (15.28%) recorded. Contaminated cases, surgical margins of the resected tumor-intralesional, marginal, and malignant tumors-were statistically significant independent risk factors for local recurrence of the tumor. Contamination, local recurrence, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, number of levels resected, and metastatic tumors compared with primary malignant tumor were shown to be independent risk factors for a patient's death. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of spinal aggressive benign and malignant bone tumors with en bloc resection is beneficial in terms of better local control and prognosis, although it is a highly demanding and risky procedure. Margins are the key point of this procedure, thus a careful preoperative oncologic and surgical staging is necessary to define the optimal surgical approach. The adverse event profile of these surgeries is high. Therefore, it should be performed by experienced and multidisciplinary teams in specialized high volume centers.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 229
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Predictors for surgical complications of en bloc resections in the spine: review of 220 cases treated by the same team
    Boriani, Stefano
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Ghermandi, Riccardo
    Lador, Ran
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (12) : 3932 - 3941
  • [2] Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine
    Boriani, Stefano
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Donthineni, Rakesh
    Amendola, Luca
    Cappuccio, Michele
    De Iure, Federico
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 19 (02) : 231 - 241
  • [3] Complications of En Bloc Resections in the Spine
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Boriani, Stefano
    Donthineni, Rakesh
    Amendola, L.
    Cappuccio, Michele
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 40 (01) : 125 - +
  • [4] Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine
    Stefano Boriani
    Stefano Bandiera
    Rakesh Donthineni
    Luca Amendola
    Michele Cappuccio
    Federico De Iure
    Alessandro Gasbarrini
    European Spine Journal, 2010, 19 : 231 - 241
  • [5] En bloc resections for primary spinal tumors in 20 years of experience: effectiveness and safety
    Amendola, Luca
    Cappuccio, Michele
    De Iure, Federico
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    Boriani, Stefano
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (11) : 2608 - 2617
  • [6] Predictors for surgical complications of en bloc resections in the spine: review of 220 cases treated by the same team
    Stefano Boriani
    Alessandro Gasbarrini
    Stefano Bandiera
    Riccardo Ghermandi
    Ran Lador
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 3932 - 3941
  • [7] En bloc resections of bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine - A preliminary report on 29 patients
    Boriani, S
    Biagini, R
    Delure, F
    Bertoni, F
    Malaguti, MC
    DiFiore, M
    Zanoni, A
    SPINE, 1996, 21 (16) : 1927 - 1931
  • [8] Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic En Bloc Vertebrectomy for Spine Tumors Technique and Outcomes in a Series of 33 Patients
    Court, Charles
    Boulate, David
    Missenard, Gilles
    Mercier, Olaf
    Fadel, Elie
    Bouthors, Charlie
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2021, 103 (12) : 1104 - 1114
  • [9] Health-related quality of life in patients treated with en bloc resection for primary tumors of the spine
    Noli, Luigi Emanuele
    Alcherigi, Chiara
    Griffoni, Cristiana
    Pesce, Eleonora
    Rosa, Simona
    Evangelisti, Gisberto
    Pipola, Valerio
    Davassi, Paolo Francesco
    Monetta, Annalisa
    Barbanti Brodano, Giovanni
    Terzi, Silvia
    Ghermandi, Riccardo
    Tedesco, Giuseppe
    Girolami, Marco
    Bandiera, Stefano
    Gasbarrini, Alessandro
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [10] En bloc resection in patients younger than 16 years affected by primary spine tumors: indications, results and complications in a series of 22 patients
    Luzzati, Alessandro
    Scotto, Gennaro
    Cannavo, Luca
    di Uccio, Alessandra Scotto
    Orlando, Giuseppe
    Petriello, Luisa
    Zoccali, Carmine
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (12) : 3135 - 3147