Combining theory and wisdom in pragmatic, scenario-based decision support for sustainable development

被引:47
作者
Davenport, Megan [1 ]
Delport, Marion [1 ]
Blignaut, James Nelson [2 ,3 ]
Hichert, Tanja [4 ]
van der Burgh, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Agr Econ, BFAP, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Sch Publ Leadership, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[3] SAEON, Pretoria, South Africa
[4] Hichert & Associates Pty Ltd, Somerset West, South Africa
关键词
scenario analysis; sustainable development; decision support; five capitals; story-and-simulation; COMPLEX; SCIENCE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2018.1428185
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Researchers have increasingly acknowledged the relative strength of hybrid' approaches to scenario analysis for exploring the futures of coupled human-nature systems. In this paper, we explain, demonstrate, and provisionally evaluate the usefulness of a simple analytical framework, based on five categories of capital assets, as part of a protocol for overcoming the conversion problem in hybrid scenario analysis. Based on a preliminary application of the framework to a case study in South Africa, we suggest that the five capitals framework has the potential to improve expedience and counter the bias against soft' drivers in hybrid approaches to scenario analysis. However, in light of the methodological trade-off between rigour and expedience, we suggest that future research needs to compare the available protocols for hybrid scenario analysis by weighing up the relative gain in scenario quality versus the relative cost of scenario construction.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 716
页数:25
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Alcamo J., 2008, ENV FUTURES, P123, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-101X(08)00406-7
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1439.003
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, The Sustainable Development Agenda
[4]   Are we consuming too much? [J].
Arrow, K ;
Dasgupta, P ;
Goulder, L ;
Daily, G ;
Ehrlich, P ;
Heal, G ;
Levin, S ;
Mäler, KG ;
Schneider, S ;
Starrett, D ;
Walker, B .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 18 (03) :147-172
[5]   Sustainability and the measurement of wealth [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. ;
Dasgupta, Partha ;
Goulder, Lawrence H. ;
Mumford, Kevin J. ;
Oleson, Kirsten .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2012, 17 :317-353
[6]  
Arrow Kenneth J., 2012, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V18, P504, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1355770X12000186
[7]   Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda [J].
Bai, Xuemei ;
van der Leeuw, Sander ;
O'Brien, Karen ;
Berkhout, Frans ;
Biermann, Frank ;
Brondizio, Eduardo S. ;
Cudennec, Christophe ;
Dearing, John ;
Duraiappah, Anantha ;
Glaser, Marion ;
Revkin, Andrew ;
Steffen, Will ;
Syvitski, James .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2016, 39 :351-362
[8]   Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as 'learning machines' [J].
Berkhout, F ;
Hertin, J ;
Jordan, A .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2002, 12 (02) :83-95
[9]  
BIGGS D, 2011, ECOLOGY SOC, V16
[10]   Strategies for managing complex social-ecological systems in the face of uncertainty: examples from South Africa and beyond [J].
Biggs, Reinette ;
Rhode, Clint ;
Archibald, Sally ;
Kunene, Lucky Makhosini ;
Mutanga, Shingirirai S. ;
Nkuna, Nghamula ;
Ocholla, Peter Omondi ;
Phadima, Lehlohonolo Joe .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01)