International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome and experience measure for hand conditions (HAND-Q)

被引:7
作者
Sierakowski, Kyra [1 ,2 ]
Dean, Nicola R. [1 ,2 ]
Pusic, Andrea L. [3 ]
Cano, Stefan J. [4 ]
Griffin, Philip A. [2 ]
Bain, Gregory I. [1 ,5 ]
Klassen, Anne [6 ]
Lalonde, Donald [7 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Modus Outcomes, Letchworth Garden City, England
[5] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Pediat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Dalhousie Univ, Div Plast Surg, St John, NB, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
TASK-FORCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; PRO INSTRUMENTS; HEALTH-STATUS; VALIDITY; SHOULDER; SURGERY; ARM; DISABILITIES; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025822
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are instruments used to measure outcomes and experiences of healthcare from the patient perspective. The specific methodology used to develop a PROM should be communicated to establish the quality of the instrument. This mixed methods protocol describes the development of a cross-cultural, internationally applicable PROM for hand conditions, the HAND-Q. Methods and analysis The multiphase approach used for this study has been previously used with the development of other PROMs by our team (eg, BODY-Q, BREAST-Q, CLEFT-Q, FACE-Q). In Phase I, we establish what important concepts matter to patients with hand conditions. A conceptual framework is developed from a systematic review of existing PROMs in the field and an extensive international qualitative study. Interpretive description is the qualitative approach used. Item generation is based on the qualitative data. The preliminary scales will be created for each theme identified in the conceptual framework. These scales will be refined by cognitive debriefing interviews with participants and expert input. Phase II involves a large international sample of patients with varied hand conditions completing the field-test version of the HAND-Q. The scales will be refined using the modern psychometric approach of Rasch Measurement Theory. Analysis will result in a shortened set of clinically meaningful and scientifically robust HAND-Q scales. Ethics and dissemination This study is coordinated at Flinders University (Adelaide, Australia) where it has ethics board approval for phase I and phase II. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Alonso, Jordi
    Stratford, Paul W.
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Bouter, Lex M.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (04) : 539 - 549
  • [22] Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Reliability Process of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in a Turkish Population
    Oksuz, Cigdem
    Akel, Burcu Semin
    Oskay, Deran
    Leblebicioglu, Gursel
    Hayran, K. Mutlu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 36A (03): : 486 - 492
  • [23] An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
    Pallant, Julie F.
    Tennant, Alan
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 46 : 1 - 18
  • [24] Content Validity-Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2-Assessing Respondent Understanding
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Gwaltney, Chad J.
    Leidy, Nancy Kline
    Martin, Mona L.
    Molsen, Elizabeth
    Ring, Lena
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (08) : 978 - 988
  • [25] Content Validity-Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1-Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument
    Patrick, Donald L.
    Burke, Laurie B.
    Gwaltney, Chad J.
    Leidy, Nancy Kline
    Martin, Mona L.
    Molsen, Elizabeth
    Ring, Lena
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (08) : 967 - 977
  • [26] Qualitative research in health care - Analysing qualitative data (Reprinted from Qualitative Research in Health Care)
    Pope, C
    Ziebland, S
    Mays, N
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7227): : 114 - 116
  • [27] What Is Value in Health Care?.
    Porter, Michael E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (26) : 2477 - 2481
  • [28] ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Wyrwich, Kathleen W.
    Wu, Albert W.
    Velikova, Galina
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Snyder, Claire F.
    Schwartz, Carolyn
    Revicki, Dennis A.
    Moinpour, Carol M.
    McLeod, Lori D.
    Lyons, Jessica C.
    Lenderking, William R.
    Hinds, Pamela S.
    Hays, Ron D.
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    Gershon, Richard
    Feeny, David
    Fayers, Peter M.
    Cella, David
    Brundage, Michael
    Ahmed, Sara
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Butt, Zeeshan
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (08) : 1889 - 1905
  • [29] Rhee PC, 2017, J HAND SURG-AM, P42
  • [30] International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CLEFT-Q)
    Riff, Karen W. Y. Wong
    Tsangaris, Elena
    Goodacre, Tim
    Forrest, Christopher R.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Klassen, Anne F.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (01):