International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome and experience measure for hand conditions (HAND-Q)

被引:7
作者
Sierakowski, Kyra [1 ,2 ]
Dean, Nicola R. [1 ,2 ]
Pusic, Andrea L. [3 ]
Cano, Stefan J. [4 ]
Griffin, Philip A. [2 ]
Bain, Gregory I. [1 ,5 ]
Klassen, Anne [6 ]
Lalonde, Donald [7 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Modus Outcomes, Letchworth Garden City, England
[5] Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Pediat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Dalhousie Univ, Div Plast Surg, St John, NB, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
TASK-FORCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; PRO INSTRUMENTS; HEALTH-STATUS; VALIDITY; SHOULDER; SURGERY; ARM; DISABILITIES; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025822
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are instruments used to measure outcomes and experiences of healthcare from the patient perspective. The specific methodology used to develop a PROM should be communicated to establish the quality of the instrument. This mixed methods protocol describes the development of a cross-cultural, internationally applicable PROM for hand conditions, the HAND-Q. Methods and analysis The multiphase approach used for this study has been previously used with the development of other PROMs by our team (eg, BODY-Q, BREAST-Q, CLEFT-Q, FACE-Q). In Phase I, we establish what important concepts matter to patients with hand conditions. A conceptual framework is developed from a systematic review of existing PROMs in the field and an extensive international qualitative study. Interpretive description is the qualitative approach used. Item generation is based on the qualitative data. The preliminary scales will be created for each theme identified in the conceptual framework. These scales will be refined by cognitive debriefing interviews with participants and expert input. Phase II involves a large international sample of patients with varied hand conditions completing the field-test version of the HAND-Q. The scales will be refined using the modern psychometric approach of Rasch Measurement Theory. Analysis will result in a shortened set of clinically meaningful and scientifically robust HAND-Q scales. Ethics and dissemination This study is coordinated at Flinders University (Adelaide, Australia) where it has ethics board approval for phase I and phase II. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, SAGE ENCY QUALITATIV
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, FED REGISTER
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1960, G R STUD MATH PSYCH, V1
  • [5] The patient outcomes of surgery-hand/arm (POS-Hand/Arm): A new patient-based outcome measure
    Cano, SJ
    Browne, JP
    Lamping, DL
    Roberts, AHN
    McGrouther, DA
    Black, NA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2004, 29B (05) : 477 - 485
  • [6] The problem with health measurement
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Hobart, Jeremy C.
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2011, 5 : 279 - 290
  • [7] The Science behind Quality-of-Life Measurement: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons
    Cano, Stefan J.
    Klassen, Anne
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (03) : 98E - 106E
  • [8] Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire
    Chung, KC
    Pillsbury, MS
    Walters, MR
    Hayward, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1998, 23A (04): : 575 - 587
  • [9] Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations
    Cohen, Deborah J.
    Crabtree, Benjamin. F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2008, 6 (04) : 331 - 339
  • [10] Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods
    Collins, D
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) : 229 - 238