Life Cycle Assessment of biogas upgrading routes

被引:20
作者
Lorenzi, G. [1 ,2 ]
Gorgoroni, M. [3 ]
Silva, C. [1 ]
Santarelli, M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, IN, Ave Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Energy Technol, Brinellvagen 68, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Politecn Torino, Dept Energy DENERG, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
来源
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS | 2019年 / 158卷
关键词
Biogas Upgrading; SOEC; High Pressure Water Scrubber; Life Cycle Assessment; BIOMETHANE INJECTION; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; NATURAL-GAS; ELECTROLYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.466
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The upgrading of biogas to biomethane, by removing contaminants and carbon dioxide, is a treatment that allows this gaseous fuel to reach the specifications suitable for the injection in the natural gas grid and the use as vehicle fuel. This pathway enables the conversion of wet biomass into a perfect substitute of natural gas. Biogas upgrading is usually performed through CO2 removal and the most diffused method is water scrubbing. However, the embedded CO2 could be directly recycled into methane through a high-temperature co-electrolysis process followed by a methanation step, thus increasing the yield of biomethane for the same biogas inlet. In this paper the environmental impacts of two routes for biomethane production are compared in the framework of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. A sensitivity analysis for different shares of renewable content in electricity has been carried out. The results show that the large need for electrical energy penalizes the electrolytic process for renewable contents of the electricity which are not close to 100%. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2012 / 2018
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Comparative life cycle assessment of Ni-based catalyst synthesis processes [J].
Agarski, Boris ;
Nikolic, Vesna ;
Kamberovic, Zeljko ;
Angic, Zoran ;
Kosec, Borut ;
Budak, Igor .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 :7-15
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Redes energeticas Nac, P36
[3]   Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology [J].
Collet, Pierre ;
Flottes, Eglantine ;
Favre, Alain ;
Raynal, Ludovic ;
Pierre, Helene ;
Capela, Sandra ;
Peregrina, Carlos .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 192 :282-295
[4]  
E. B. Association, 2016, BIOM TRANSP
[5]   Opportunities and challenges: Landfill gas to biomethane injection into natural gas distribution grid through pipeline [J].
Hoo, Poh Ying ;
Hashim, Haslenda ;
Ho, Wai Shin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 :409-419
[6]   Hydrogen and synthetic fuel production using high temperature solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) [J].
Kazempoor, P. ;
Braun, R. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (09) :3599-3612
[7]   Exergo-economic analysis of a direct biogas upgrading process to synthetic natural gas via integrated high-temperature electrolysis and methanation [J].
Lorenzi, Guido ;
Lanzini, Andrea ;
Santarelli, Massimo ;
Martin, Andrew .
ENERGY, 2017, 141 :1524-1537
[8]   Digester Gas Upgrading to Synthetic Natural Gas in Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells [J].
Lorenzi, Guido ;
Lanzini, Andrea ;
Santarelli, Massimo .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2015, 29 (03) :1641-1652
[9]  
Moreira N. A., 2011, CONSTRAINTS
[10]  
Moretti M., 2017, J CLEAN PROD