Impact of Implementing 100% Rapid Review as a Quality Control Tool in Cervical Cytology

被引:3
作者
Magalhaes, Juliana Cristina [1 ]
Silveira Azara, Cinara Zago [1 ]
do Nascimento Tavares, Sulene Brito [1 ]
Claudio Manrique, Edna Joana [2 ]
Amaral, Rita Goreti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Pharm, Rua 240,Esquina Com 5a,Ave S-N,Setor Leste Univ, BR-74605170 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Pontifical Catholic Univ Goias, Goiania, Go, Brazil
关键词
Cervical cancer; Cervical smears; Screening; Quality control; GYNECOLOGIC CYTOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1159/000487426
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing 100% rapid review (100% RR) as a quality control tool in cervical smear cytology. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which cytology findings, false-negative results, and quality indicators were evaluated. The variables were analyzed in 2004, the year in which 100% RR was implemented, and again in 2013, i.e., 10 years on. Results: Detection of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) increased from 0.90% in 2004 to 2.47% in 2013 by routine screening. Detection of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) increased from 13.33% in 2004 to 36.27% in 2013 by 100% RR. Detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) increased from 0.64% in 2004 to 4.29% in 2013 by routine screening, and increased from 0% in 2004 to 19.61% in 2013 by 100% RR. There was a significant increase (p = 0.00001) in the identification of false-negative results of ASCUS, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, ASC-H, HSIL, and atypical glandular cells. All quality indicators had increased in 2013 when compared to 2004 results. Conclusions: Ten years after the implementation of the 100% RR method, improvements were found in the detection of atypia and precursor lesions and in quality indicators. (C) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 120
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Historical Analysis of the Brazilian Cervical Cancer Screening Program from 2006 to 2013: A Time for Reflection [J].
Alves Costa, Ricardo Filipe ;
Longatto-Filho, Adhemar ;
Pinheiro, Celine ;
Zeferino, Luiz Carlos ;
Fregnani, Jose Humberto .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09)
[2]   Impact of training about cervical cancer screening on health professionals working in basic health care units [J].
Amaral, Ariadne Ferreira ;
Araujo, Eduardo Silva ;
Magalhaes, Juliana Cristina ;
Silveira, Erika Aparecida ;
do Nascimento Tavares, Suelene Brito ;
Amaral, Rita Goreti .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2014, 36 (04) :182-187
[3]  
[Anonymous], REV APS
[4]  
[Anonymous], ISRN OBSTET GYNECOL
[5]  
[Anonymous], SIST INF CANC COL UT
[6]  
[Anonymous], DIV DET PREC AP ORG
[7]  
Araujo Jr Mario Lucio C., 2015, J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab., V51, P102, DOI 10.5935/1676-2444.20150018
[8]   Rapid Prescreening in Gynecologic Cytology A More Efficient Quality Assurance Method [J].
Auger, Manon .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 119 (06) :357-360
[9]   Using the ASC:SIL Ratio, Human Papillomavirus, and Interobserver Variability to Assess and Monitor Cytopathology Fellow Training Performance [J].
Chebib, Ivan ;
Rao, Rema A. ;
Wilbur, David C. ;
Tambouret, Rosemary H. .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 121 (11) :638-643
[10]   Effectiveness of Rapid Prescreening and 10% Rescreening in Liquid-Based Papanicolaou Testing [J].
Currens, Heather S. ;
Nejkauf, Katharine ;
Wagner, Lynn ;
Raab, Stephen S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 137 (01) :150-155