Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Abutment Syndrome: The Results of Metaphyseal and Diaphyseal Osteotomies

被引:5
作者
Imai, Hirofumi [1 ]
Takahara, Masatoshi [1 ]
Kondo, Mikiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Izumi Orthopaed Hosp, Ctr Hand Elbow & Sports Med, 6-1 Maruyama, Sendai, Miyagi 9813121, Japan
关键词
Bone union; Diaphyseal osteotomy; Metaphyseal osteotomy; Ulnar abutment syndrome; Ulnar shortening osteotomy; TRIANGULAR FIBROCARTILAGE COMPLEX; TEARS;
D O I
10.1142/S2424835520500538
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to report the results of metaphyseal and diaphyseal ulnar shortening osteotomies (USO) for the treatment of ulnar abutment syndrome (UAS). Methods: From 2011 to 2016, we performed metaphyseal USO in 8 patients (8 wrists) and diaphyseal USO in 6 patients (7 wrists). The results were investigated in terms of bone union and cast immobilization, wrist and forearm range of motion (ROM). The mean follow-up duration was 29 months. Results: All 14 patients had bone union. The mean duration of bone union in metaphyseal USO and diaphyseal USO were 3.5 months and 4.3 months and the duration of cast immobilization after surgery were 24.2 days and 29.2 days. The mean forearm ROM (degree) were 134.3 (pronation/supination: 66.7/67.6) and 169.3 (pronation/supination: 84.3/85.0) at 3 months after surgery and 173.4 (pronation/supination: 86.0/87.4) and 172.8 (pronation/supination: 87.1/85.7) at 6 months after surgery. Conclusions: The results from this study suggest that metaphyseal osteotomies are an effective alternative to diaphyseal osteotomies for the treatment of ulnar abutment syndrome. Although metaphyseal osteotomies were associated with temporary decrease of pronation, this discrepancy resolved at 6 months postoperatively. Metaphyseal USO has the potential to promote primary bone union and appears to be an alternative treatment for UAS.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 480
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ARONSON J, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P25
[2]  
BOULAS HJ, 1990, J HAND SURG-AM, V15A, P415
[3]   Ulnar Shortening for Adolescent Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes [J].
Cha, Soo-Min ;
Shin, Hyun-Dae ;
Kim, Kyung-Cheon ;
Park, Eugene .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 37A (12) :2462-2467
[4]  
Deshmukh SC, 2000, J HAND SURG-BRIT EUR, V25B, P434
[5]   Biomechanical Analysis of the Distal Metaphyseal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy [J].
Greenberg, Jeffrey A. ;
Werner, Frederick W. ;
Smith, Jared M. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 38A (10) :1919-1924
[6]   Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation [J].
Imaeda, Toshihiko ;
Uchiyama, Shigeharu ;
Wada, Takuro ;
Okinaga, Shuji ;
Sawaizumi, Takuya ;
Omokawa, Shohei ;
Momose, Toshimitsu ;
Moritomo, Hisao ;
Gotani, Hiroyuki ;
Abe, Yukio ;
Nishida, Jun ;
Kanaya, Fuminori .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2010, 15 (04) :509-517
[7]   Factors affecting results of ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome [J].
Iwasaki, Norimasa ;
Ishikawa, Jyunichi ;
Kato, Hiroyuki ;
Minami, Michio ;
Minami, Akio .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (465) :215-219
[8]  
J Owens, 2018, J HAND SURG AM
[9]  
Kawano M, 1998, Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg, V2, P242, DOI 10.1097/00130911-199812000-00003
[10]  
Keiji K, 1995, J JPN SOC SURG HAND, V12, P21