A Hesitant Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution Framework-Based on Discrimination Measure for Ranking Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistic Providers

被引:43
作者
Mishra, Arunodaya Raj [1 ]
Rani, Pratibha [2 ]
Krishankumar, Raghunathan [3 ]
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [4 ]
Cavallaro, Fausto [5 ]
Ravichandran, Kattur S. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Govt Coll, Dept Math, Jaitwara 485221, Madhya Pradesh, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Math, Warangal 506004, Telangana, India
[3] Sastra Univ, Dept Comp, Thanjavur 613401, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Inst Sustainable Construct, Sauletekio Ave 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
[5] Univ Molise, Dept Econ, Via Sanctis, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy
[6] Rajiv Gandhi Natl Inst Youth Dev, Adm Area, Sriperumbudur 602105, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
hesitant fuzzy sets; discrimination measure; multi-criteria decision-making; combined compromise solution; SUPPLIER SELECTION; DECISION-MAKING; SETS; SWARA; AGGREGATION; NETWORK; GREEN; MODEL; MCDM;
D O I
10.3390/su13042064
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Customers' pressure, social responsibility, and government regulations have motivated the enterprises to consider the reverse logistics (RL) in their operations. Recently, companies frequently outsource their RL practices to third-party reverse logistics providers (3PRLPs) to concentrate on their primary concern and diminish costs. However, to select the suitable 3PRLP candidate requires a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) process involving uncertainty owing to the presence of many associated aspects. In order to choose the most appropriate sustainable 3PRLP (S3PRLP), we introduce a hybrid approach based on the classical Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) method and propose a discrimination measure within the context of hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs). This approach offers a new process based on the discrimination measure for evaluating the criteria weights. The efficiency and practicability of the present approach are numerically demonstrated by solving an illustrative case study of S3PRLPs selection under a hesitant fuzzy environment. Moreover, sensitivity and comparative studies are presented to highlight the robustness and strength of the introduced methodology. The result of this work concludes that the introduced methodology can recommend a more feasible performance when facing with determinate and inconsistent knowledge and qualitative data.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Decomposition theorems and extension principles for hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Alcantud, Jose Carlos R. ;
Torra, Vicenc .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2018, 41 :48-56
[2]   Evaluating the green growth indicators to achieve sustainable development: A novel extended interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy-combined compromise solution approach [J].
Alrasheedi, Melfi ;
Mardani, Abbas ;
Mishra, Arunodaya R. ;
Streimikiene, Dalia ;
Liao, Huchang ;
Al-nefaie, Abdullah H. .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 29 (01) :120-142
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Journal of Information and Computational Science, DOI [10.12733/jics20101859, DOI 10.12733/JICS20101859]
[4]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[5]   Third-party reverse logistics provider selection: A computational semantic analysis-based multi-perspective multi-attribute decision-making approach [J].
Chen, Zhen-Song ;
Zhang, Xuan ;
Govindan, Kannan ;
Wang, Xian-Jia ;
Chin, Kwai-Sang .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 166
[6]   Autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on hesitant fuzzy sets for green hotels selection and bidders selection [J].
Cheng, Shou-Hsiung .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2018, 467 :604-617
[7]   Multi-criteria evaluation of energy storage technologies based on hesitant fuzzy information: A case study for Turkey [J].
Colak, Murat ;
Kayab, Ihsan .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 28
[8]   Choquet integral-based hesitant fuzzy decision-making to prevent soil erosion [J].
Demirel, Tufan ;
Oner, Sultan Ceren ;
Tuzun, Serhat ;
Deveci, Muhammet ;
Oner, Mahir ;
Demirel, Nihan Cetin .
GEODERMA, 2018, 313 :276-289
[9]   Site selection for hydrogen underground storage using interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets [J].
Deveci, Muhammet .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (19) :9353-9368
[10]   An extended TODIM approach for group emergency decision making based on bidirectional projection with hesitant triangular fuzzy sets [J].
Ding, Quanyu ;
Wang, Ying-Ming ;
Goh, Mark .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 151