Investigation of bacterial attachment and biofilm formation of two different Pseudoalteromonas species: Comparison of different methods

被引:15
|
作者
Moradi, Masoumeh [1 ]
Song, Zhenlun [1 ]
Nie, Xia [1 ]
Yan, Minsheng [1 ]
Hu, Fang Qin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ningbo Inst Mat Technol & Engn, Key Lab Marine New Mat & Related Technol, Zhejiang Key Lab Marine Mat & Protect Technol, Ningbo 315201, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Titanium and alloys; Confocal microscopy; Microscopy; Biological adhesion; Biofilm formation; MICROBIAL ADHESION; CORROSION BEHAVIOR; STAINLESS-STEEL; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.11.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Biological fouling in marine environments creates numerous problems for engineered structures. Microbial attachment to a solid surface and biofilm formation initiates the process of biofouling. Therefore, detecting the initial bacterial attachment and understanding the mechanism of biofilm formation are important for controlling biofouling. In the present study, the mechanisms of bacterial attachment and biofilm formation of two marine isolated bacteria, namely Pseudoalteromonas sp. and Pseudoalteromonas flavipulchra on Ti-coated samples were examined through different electrochemical, surface analysis and thermodynamic methods. The results revealed that the rate of bacterial attachment and mechanism of biofilm formation varied for different species of bacteria. The amount of exopolysaccharide production could affect the bacterial attachment rate. Open circuit potentiometry has been found to be a valid and simple technique for continuous real-time monitoring of the biofilm formation compared to other electrochemical and thermodynamic techniques. Finally, two different models have been suggested to explain initial adhesion and biofilm formation of bacteria of different species. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 78
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interactions between Lactobacillus crispatus and Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)-Associated Bacterial Species in Initial Attachment and Biofilm Formation
    Machado, Antonio
    Jefferson, Kimberly Kay
    Cerca, Nuno
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2013, 14 (06) : 12004 - 12012
  • [22] Comparison of preparation and formation mechanism of LuAG nanopowders using two different methods
    Xing, Lin
    Peng, Luming
    MICRO & NANO LETTERS, 2012, 7 (06): : 529 - 532
  • [23] Some observations on biofilm formation in two different aquatic systems
    Water and Steam Chemistry Laboratory, Metallurgy and Materials Group, Bhabha Atom. Res. Centre Facilities, Kalpakkam 603 102, Tamil Nadu, India
    不详
    不详
    J Indian Inst Sci, 5 (371-389):
  • [24] Comparison of Methods of Detecting Bacterial Biofilm
    Tajima, Yutaka
    Yamaguchi, Tatsuo
    Takagi, Rie
    Nakajima, Tamiko
    Kominato, Yoshihiko
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2010, 56 (3-4) : 143 - 147
  • [25] Comparison of different methods of bacterial detection in blood components
    Schmidt, M.
    ISBT SCIENCE SERIES, VOL 4, NO 1, STATE OF THE ART PRESENTATIONS, 2009, 4 (01): : 80 - 86
  • [26] A comparison of two collapsing methods in different approaches
    Carmen Dering
    Arne Schillert
    Inke R König
    Andreas Ziegler
    BMC Proceedings, 8 (Suppl 1)
  • [27] Comparison of Two Different Ultrasound Methods of Phacoemulsification
    Helvacioglu, Firat
    Yeter, Celal
    Sencan, Sadik
    Tunc, Zeki
    Uyar, O. Murat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 158 (02) : 221 - 226
  • [28] Different Methods, Different Standards? A Comparison of Two Finnish Reference Budgets
    Makinen, Lauri
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2021, 23 (04) : 360 - 378
  • [29] A comparison of spirometry performed with two different methods
    Vesteng, Liv Karin
    Grongstad, Anita
    Karlsen, Christine Gudim
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2024, 64
  • [30] Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in clinical Candida isolates
    Dag, Ilknur
    Kiraz, Nuri
    Yasemin, O. Z.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 4 (24): : 2763 - 2768