Valuing live births from assisted reproduction: A health economics viewpoint

被引:4
作者
Martins, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Connolly, Mark P. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Global Market Access Solut, Hlth Econ Unit, St Prex, Switzerland
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Dept Pharm, Unit Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Global Market Access Solut SARL, CH-1162 St Prex, Switzerland
关键词
Infertility; Medically assisted reproduction; Economic value of life; Health economics; Human capital; Quality-adjusted life year (QALY); QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; TECHNOLOGY; INFERTILITY; PREGNANCY; IVF; CONSEQUENCES; PERSPECTIVE; FERTILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.10.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Infertility is a medical condition that can be overcome, thanks to advances in medically assisted reproductive (MAR) therapies. Despite the ultimate measure of MAR efficacy being the birth of a new human being, there are ethical and methodological questions as to which outcome best translates the value of MAR in cost-effectiveness analyses. Many authors favour cost per life birth outcomes instead of more traditional cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which raises generalizability issues for decision-makers. Nonetheless, infertility and infertility treatments sub-stantially differ from other health conditions and health treat-ments, particularly in the way they affect the quality of life of the infertile couple. Collecting quality of life measures in infertility and pregnancy is also surrounded by challenges not easily overcome. We reflect on cost-effectiveness methods applied to MAR tech-nologies, on ethical considerations for valuing a MAR-generated life, and on its broader societal value for consideration by deci-sion-makers.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 158
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Assisted reproductive technology treatments and quality of life: a longitudinal study among subfertile women and men [J].
Agostini, Francesca ;
Monti, Fiorella ;
Andrei, Federica ;
Paterlini, Marcella ;
Palomba, Stefano ;
La Sala, Giovanni Battista .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2017, 34 (10) :1307-1315
[2]  
Aldy JE, 2020, REV ENV ECON POLICY
[3]   Public goods and procreation [J].
Anomaly, Jonathan .
MONASH BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2014, 32 (3-4) :172-188
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, BBC
[5]   'Cheaper than a newcomer': on the social production of IVF policy in Israel [J].
Birenbaum-Carmeli, D .
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2004, 26 (07) :897-924
[6]   The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties [J].
Boivin, Jacky ;
Takefman, Janet ;
Braverman, Andrea .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (08) :2084-2091
[7]   Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review [J].
Chachamovich, Juliana Rigol ;
Chachamovich, Eduardo ;
Ezer, Helene ;
Fleck, Marcelo P. ;
Knauth, Daniela ;
Passos, Eduardo P. .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 31 (02) :101-110
[8]   Acceptable cost for the patient and society [J].
Chambers, Georgina M. ;
Adamson, G. David ;
Eijkemans, Marinus J. C. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (02) :319-327
[9]   Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold [J].
Claxton, Karl ;
Martin, Steve ;
Soares, Marta ;
Rice, Nigel ;
Spackman, Eldon ;
Hinde, Sebastian ;
Devlin, Nancy ;
Smith, Peter C. ;
Sculpher, Mark .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (14) :1-+
[10]  
Commission E, 2021, ANN REP TAX 2021, P34