Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy

被引:24
作者
Kinnaird, Adam [1 ]
Sharma, Vidit [1 ]
Chuang, Ryan [1 ]
Priester, Alan [2 ]
Tran, Elizabeth [1 ]
Barsa, Danielle E. [1 ]
Delfin, Merdie [1 ]
Kwan, Lorna [1 ]
Sisk, Anthony [3 ]
Felker, Ely [4 ]
Marks, Leonard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, 300 Stein Plaza,3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Bioengn, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
biopsy; prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000001232
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy which reveals no cancer may impart reassurance beyond that offered by ultrasound guided biopsy. However, followup of men after a negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy has been mostly by prostate specific antigen testing and reports of followup tissue confirmation are few. We investigated the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in such men who, because of persistent cancer suspicion, subsequently underwent a repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Materials and Methods: Subjects were all men with a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy who underwent at least 1 further magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy due to continued clinical suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (September 2009 to July 2019). Biopsies were magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion with targeted and systematic cores. Regions of interest from initial magnetic resonance imaging and any new regions of interest at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were targeted. The primary end point was detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater). Results: Of 2,716 men 733 had a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Study subjects were 73/733 who underwent followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Median (IQR) age and prostate specific antigen density were 64 years (59-67) and 0.12 ng/ml/cc (0.08-0.17), respectively. Baseline PI-RADS (R) scores were 3 or greater in 74%. At followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy (median 2.4 years, IQR 1.3e3.6), 17/73 (23%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer. When followup magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion (PI-RADS 3 or greater), clinically significant prostate cancer was found in 17/53 (32%). When followup magnetic resonance imaging was negative (PI-RADS less than 3), cancer was not found (0/ 20) (p <0.01). Overall 54% of men with PI-RADS 5 at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. Conclusions: Men with negative magnetic resonance imaging following an initial negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy are unlikely to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer and may avoid repeat biopsy. However, when lesions are seen on followup magnetic resonance imaging, repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1180 / 1186
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions
    Wu, Hung-Ta H.
    Chang, Cheng-Yen
    Chang, Hsu
    Yen, Chueh-Chuan
    Cheng, Henrich
    Chen, Paul Chih-Shueh
    Chiou, Hong-Jen
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 75 (04) : 160 - 166
  • [32] Reducing prostate biopsies and magnetic resonance imaging with prostate cancer risk stratification
    Davik, Petter
    Remmers, Sebastiaan
    Elschot, Mattijs
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Bathen, Tone Frost
    Bertilsson, Helena
    BJUI COMPASS, 2022, 3 (05): : 344 - 353
  • [33] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Daniël F. Osses
    Joost J. van Asten
    Gerard J. Kieft
    Jasper D. Tijsterman
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 207 - 212
  • [34] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Osses, Daniel F.
    van Asten, Joost J.
    Kieft, Gerard J.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [35] An update on prostate biopsy in the era of magnetic resonance imaging
    Cicione, Antonio
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Manno, Stefano
    Damiano, Rocco
    Posti, Alessandro
    Lima, Estevao
    Tubaro, Andrea
    Balloni, Filippo
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (03) : 264 - 274
  • [36] Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting Prostate Biopsy Findings in Patients Considered for Active Surveillance of Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Akin, Oguz
    Afaq, Asim
    Goldman, Debra
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Eastham, James
    Scardino, Peter
    Hricak, Hedvig
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (05) : 1732 - 1738
  • [37] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Osses, Daniel
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (01) : 78 - 94
  • [38] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Chin, Joseph
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Koch, Michael
    Penson, David
    Raman, Steven
    Oto, Aytekin
    Futterer, Jurgen
    Serrallach, Marc
    Relle, James
    Lotan, Yair
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Bonekamp, David
    Haider, Masoom
    Tirkes, Temel
    Arora, Sandeep
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Persigehl, Thorsten
    Pantuck, Allan J.
    Bomers, Joyce
    Burtnyk, Mathieu
    Staruch, Robert
    Eggener, Scott
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (03) : 769 - 777
  • [39] Optimization of Prostate Biopsy: the Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection, Localization and Risk Assessment
    Bjurlin, Marc A.
    Meng, Xiaosong
    Le Nobin, Julien
    Wysock, James S.
    Lepor, Herbert
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (03) : 648 - 658
  • [40] Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection
    Haffner, Jeremie
    Lemaitre, Laurent
    Puech, Philippe
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Leroy, Xavier
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Villers, Arnauld
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) : E171 - E178