Public sector voluntary initiatives: the adoption of the environmental management system by public waste water treatment facilities in the United States

被引:4
作者
Huang, Wan-Ling [1 ]
Welch, Eric W. [2 ]
Corley, Elizabeth A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tamkang Univ, Dept Publ Adm, New Taipei City 25137, Taiwan
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Publ Adm, Sci Technol & Environm Policy Lab, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
关键词
voluntary environmental agreement; public sector voluntary initiative; environment management system; publicness; SELF-REGULATION; ISO; 14001; FIRMS; MOTIVATIONS; ISO-14001; PRIVATE; IMPLEMENTATION; ORGANIZATIONS; PARTICIPATION; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1080/09640568.2013.816630
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study examines the determinants of Environment Management System (EMS) adoption by public wastewater treatment facilities in the US. Based on the literature, it considers the range of regulatory, market and political influences on EMS adoption. The paper also incorporates prior work on publicness theory to articulate possible sectoral differences related to voluntary policy adoption. Hypotheses are tested using ordered logistic regression on data from a national survey of public wastewater treatment facilities in the US. Findings indicate that public wastewater treatment facilities that perceive stricter environmental regulation and greater attention from environmental groups and the public are more likely to voluntarily adopt an EMS. In addition, facilities reporting a higher degree of publicness are more likely to adopt in response to politician demands and when they apply greater amounts of biosolids to land. The findings carry implications for policy makers who aim to encourage public sector voluntary initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:1531 / 1551
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1973, J ECON HIST, V33, P16, DOI 10.1017/S0022050700076403
[2]   Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance [J].
Anton, WRQ ;
Deltas, G ;
Khanna, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :632-654
[3]   The 'publicness' of public organizations [J].
Antonsen, M ;
Jorgensen, TB .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1997, 75 (02) :337-357
[4]   Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program [J].
Arora, S ;
Cason, TN .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (04) :413-432
[5]   BY VOLUNTARY AGREEMENT - THE POLITICS OF INSTRUMENT SELECTION [J].
BAGGOTT, R .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1986, 64 (01) :51-67
[6]  
Bekkering M., 1999, GREENER MANAGEMENT I, V28, P103
[7]   Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 83 (03) :498-510
[8]  
Borooah V. K., 2001, LOGIT PROBIT ORDERED, V138
[9]   Implementing the environmental and social policies of a municipality through an integrated management system: theoretical framework and case study [J].
Botta, Serena ;
Comoglio, Claudio ;
Petrosillo, Irene .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 56 (07) :1073-1095
[10]  
Bovens M., 2007, The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, V2007