A New Approach to Building the Gaussian Process Model for Expensive Multi-objective Optimization

被引:3
|
作者
Luo, Jianping [1 ]
Feng, Jiqiang [2 ]
Jin, RuoFan [3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Informat Engn, Guangdong Key Lab Intelligent Informat Proc, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Math, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Informat Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICIST2019) | 2019年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Expensive optimization; Gaussian processes; multi-objective optimization; Multiple tasks; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1109/icist.2019.8836854
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
A novel approach to building a Gaussian process (GP) model for each objective more precisely is proposed in this study for expensive multi-objective optimization, where there may be little apparent similarity or correlation among objectives. These objectives are mapped to tasks where a similarity or correlation exists among them, and then these tasks are used to build the GP model jointly using multi-task GP (MTGP). This approach facilitates a mutual knowledge transfer across tasks and helps avoid tabula rasa learning for a new task and capture the structure in tasks that covary. The estimated value for each objective can be derived from the estimated values of the built MTGP model of the tasks with a reverse mapping. It also has been shown that the GP models of the well-known MOEA/D-EGO and ParEGO are both special cases of our approach. To solve the expensive multi-objective optimization problem, a multi-objective optimization framework based on this approach with MOEA/D is also developed. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm performs better than several state-of-the-art multi-objective evolutionary algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 379
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-objective robust optimization approach based on Gaussian process model
    Zhou, Qi
    Jiang, Ping
    Huang, Xiang
    Zhang, Feng
    Zhou, Taotao
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 57 (01) : 213 - 233
  • [2] A multi-objective robust optimization approach based on Gaussian process model
    Qi Zhou
    Ping Jiang
    Xiang Huang
    Feng Zhang
    Taotao Zhou
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57 : 213 - 233
  • [3] An adaptive Gaussian process based manifold transfer learning to expensive dynamic multi-objective optimization
    Zhang, Xi
    Yu, Guo
    Jin, Yaochu
    Qian, Feng
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2023, 538
  • [4] Gaussian surrogate models for expensive interval multi-objective optimization problem
    Chen Z.-W.
    Bai X.
    Yang Q.
    Huang X.-W.
    Li G.-Q.
    Bai, Xin (15233013272@163.com), 2016, South China University of Technology (33): : 1389 - 1398
  • [5] Deep Gaussian process for multi-objective Bayesian optimization
    Ali Hebbal
    Mathieu Balesdent
    Loïc Brevault
    Nouredine Melab
    El-Ghazali Talbi
    Optimization and Engineering, 2023, 24 : 1809 - 1848
  • [6] Deep Gaussian process for multi-objective Bayesian optimization
    Hebbal, Ali
    Balesdent, Mathieu
    Brevault, Loic
    Melab, Nouredine
    Talbi, El-Ghazali
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 24 (03) : 1809 - 1848
  • [7] Expensive Multiobjective Optimization by MOEA/D With Gaussian Process Model
    Zhang, Qingfu
    Liu, Wudong
    Tsang, Edward
    Virginas, Botond
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2010, 14 (03) : 456 - 474
  • [8] A novel efficient multi-objective optimization algorithm for expensive building simulation models
    Albertin, Riccardo
    Prada, Alessandro
    Gasparella, Andrea
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 297
  • [9] An adaptive batch Bayesian optimization approach for expensive multi-objective problems
    Wang, Hongyan
    Xu, Hua
    Yuan, Yuan
    Zhang, Zeqiu
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 611 : 446 - 463
  • [10] MOEA/D assisted by RBF Networks for Expensive Multi-Objective Optimization Problems
    Zapotecas Martinez, Saul
    Coello Coello, Carlos A.
    GECCO'13: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE, 2013, : 1405 - 1412