Risk factors for polyoma virus nephropathy

被引:75
作者
Prince, Olivier [1 ]
Savic, Spasenija [1 ]
Dickenmann, Michael
Steiger, Jurg
Bubendorf, Lukas [1 ]
Mihatsch, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Inst Pathol, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
BK virus; decoy cell; polyoma virus-associated nephropathy; renal transplantation; risk factors; RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS; BK-VIRUS; INTERSTITIAL NEPHRITIS; KIDNEY-ALLOGRAFT; HEMORRHAGIC CYSTITIS; GRAFT DYSFUNCTION; VIRAL-INFECTION; DIAGNOSIS; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; REJECTION;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gfn671
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Polyoma virus-associated nephropathy (PVN) is a common cause of renal transplant failure. The risk factors for the development of PVN have not yet been studied in large cohorts of patients for periods of 20 years. Methods. We collected clinical, renal biopsy and urinary cytology data from all patients with renal transplantations performed at the University Hospital of Basel from 1985 to 2005. All patients with a renal biopsy and urine cytology were included (n = 880). Renal transplants were divided into three groups, according to evidence of polyoma virus (PV) infection (decoy cells in the urine) and biopsy-proven PVN: 1. Renal transplants without evidence of a PV infection (n = 751). 2. Renal transplants with PV reactivation, e. g. decoy cell (DC) found by urinary cytology, but without PVN (n = 90). 3. Renal transplants with PVN (n = 39). Results. The prevalence of biopsy-proven PVN in this cohort of patients was 3.3%. Immunosuppression with mycophenolate and/or tacrolimus, ATGAM, male gender of the recipient and a higher number of transplant rejection episodes were factors significantly associated with PVN development. Conclusions. The most important risk factors for the development of PVN are acute rejection and ATGAM used as induction therapy as well as tacrolimus and mycophenolate as maintenance therapy. Therefore, we conclude that patients with tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance therapy should be carefully monitored for the development of PVN.
引用
收藏
页码:1024 / 1033
页数:10
相关论文
共 74 条
[41]  
Mackenzie E F, 1978, Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc, V15, P352
[42]   Graft dysfunction and polyomavirus infection in renal allograft recipients [J].
Maiza, H ;
Fontaniere, B ;
Dijoud, F ;
Pouteil-Noble, C .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (03) :809-811
[43]  
Mathur VS, 1997, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V29, P754
[44]   Polyomavirus BK infection [J].
Matlosz, B ;
Mróz, A ;
Durlik, M ;
Wesolowska, A ;
Sadowska, A ;
Cieciura, T ;
Perkowska, A ;
Deborska-Materkowska, D ;
Szmidt, J ;
Michalak, G ;
Paczek, L ;
Lao, M .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (06) :2196-2198
[45]   Polyomavirus infection and acute vascular rejection in a kidney allograft: Coincidence or mimicry? [J].
McGilvray, ID ;
Lajoie, G ;
Humar, A ;
Cattral, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (04) :501-504
[46]   Incidence of polyomavirus-nephropathy in renal allografts: influence of modern immunosuppressive drugs [J].
Mengel, M ;
Marwedel, M ;
Radermacher, J ;
Eden, G ;
Schwarz, A ;
Haller, H ;
Kreipe, H .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 18 (06) :1190-1196
[47]   Prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of BK virus nephropathy in Japanese renal transplant patients: analysis in protocol and episode biopsies [J].
Namba, Y ;
Moriyama, T ;
Kyo, M ;
Imamura, R ;
Shi, Y ;
Ichimaru, N ;
Oka, K ;
Takahara, S ;
Okuyama, A .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 19 (01) :97-101
[48]   Acute bleeding after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) - Incidence and effect on survival. A quantitative analysis in 1,402 patients [J].
Nevo, S ;
Swan, V ;
Enger, C ;
Wojno, KJ ;
Bitton, R ;
Shabooti, M ;
Fuller, AK ;
Jones, RJ ;
Braine, HG ;
Vogelsang, GB .
BLOOD, 1998, 91 (04) :1469-1477
[49]  
Nickeleit V, 1999, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V10, P1080
[50]   BK-virus nephropathy in renal transplants - tubular necrosis, MHC-class II expression and rejection in a puzzling game [J].
Nickeleit, V ;
Hirsch, HH ;
Zeiler, M ;
Gudat, F ;
Prince, O ;
Thiel, G ;
Mihatsch, MJ .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 15 (03) :324-332