Comparing the degree of land-atmosphere interaction in four atmospheric general circulation models

被引:0
作者
Koster, RD
Dirmeyer, PA
Hahmann, AN
Ijpelaar, R
Tyahla, L
Cox, P
Suarez, MJ
机构
[1] NASA, Hydrol Sci Branch, Lab Hydrospher Proc, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Ctr Ocean Land Atmosphere Studies, Calverton, MD USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Inst Atmospher Phys, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[4] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Global Sci & Technol Inc, Lanham, MD USA
[6] Met Off, Hadley Ctr Climate Predict & Res, Bracknell, Berks, England
[7] NASA, Climate & Radiat Branch, Atmospheres Lab, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0363:CTDOLA>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The strength of the coupling between the land and the atmosphere, which controls, for example, the degree to which precipitation-induced soil moisture anomalies affect the overlying atmosphere and thereby the subsequent generation of precipitation, has been examined and quantified with many atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs). Generally missing from such studies, however, is an indication of the extent to which the simulated coupling strength is model dependent. Four modeling groups have recently performed a highly controlled numerical experiment that allows an objective intermodel comparison of land-atmosphere coupling strength, focusing on short (weekly down to subhourly) timescales. The experiment essentially consists of an ensemble of 1-month simulations in which each member simulation artificially maintains the same (model specific) time series of surface prognostic variables. Differences in atmospheric behavior between the ensemble members then indicate the degree to which the state of the land surface controls atmospheric processes in that model. A comparison of the four sets of experimental results shows that coupling strength does indeed vary significantly among the AGCMs.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 375
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Bonan GB, 1998, J CLIMATE, V11, P1307, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1307:TLSCOT>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]  
Boville BA, 1998, J CLIMATE, V11, P1115, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1115:TNCSMV>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity [J].
Cox, PM ;
Betts, RA ;
Bunton, CB ;
Essery, RLH ;
Rowntree, PR ;
Smith, J .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 1999, 15 (03) :183-203
[6]   A canopy conductance and photosynthesis model for use in a GCM land surface scheme [J].
Cox, PM ;
Huntingford, C ;
Harding, RJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1998, 212 (1-4) :79-94
[7]  
DAVIES R, 1982, 83961 NASA GODD SPAC
[8]  
DELWORTH T, 1989, J CLIMATE, V2, P1447, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1989)002<1447:TIOSWO>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Dickinson R., 1984, Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, Geophysical Monograph, V29, P58, DOI [10.1029/GM029p0058, DOI 10.1029/GM029P0058]