Te Ara Mua -Future Streets: Knowledge exchange and the highs and lows of researcher-practitioner collaboration to design active travel infrastructure

被引:11
作者
Witten, Karen [1 ]
Carroll, Penelope [1 ]
Calder-Dawe, Octavia [1 ]
Smith, Melody [2 ]
Field, Adrian [3 ]
Hosking, Jamie [2 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, POB 6137,Wellesley St, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[3] Dovetail Consulting Ltd, Box 78-146, Auckland 1245, New Zealand
关键词
Collaboration; Participatory design; Knowledge exchange; Infrastructure; Active travel; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ORGANIZATIONS; FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jth.2018.03.001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Transforming vehicle-focused street infrastructure to support a shift to active travel modes can pose a complex interdisciplinary challenge requiring innovation and collaboration between residents, researchers and transport design and policy practitioners. Te Ara Mua-Future Streets is a street redesign intervention study that aims to slow traffic, change driver behaviour and make walking and cycling easier and safer in Mangere, a suburban neighbourhood in Auckland, New Zealand. It is a collaborative project between a research team, local community and the city's transport agency. Community engagement, evidence-based design innovation and outcome evaluation are primarily the responsibility of the research team while responsibility for infrastructure funding, procurement and delivery lies with Auckland Transport. Notwithstanding a shared commitment to the project's vision of street design innovation for health gain, the collaboration and implementation process has been challenging. Drawing on analyses of interviews conducted with researchers and transport agency personnel at two time points, the paper documents the collaborative process - factors that threatened to derail the design and delivery of innovative street design and those that ultimately enabled construction of a non-business-asusual, neighbourhood scale intervention. Differences in the professional norms and practices of transport engineers and researchers, contrasting organisational cultures and approaches to risk, and lack of organisational readiness and capacity challenged the collaboration. Sharing insights on factors that had jeopardised the collaborative processes became a catalyst for change, and, coupled with the determination of individual researchers and engineers, enabled the collaboration to move forward to complete the intervention and identify mechanisms to facilitate knowledge exchange in future transport and health, researcher-practitioner collaborations.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 44
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods
    Best, Allan
    Holmes, Bev
    [J]. EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2010, 6 (02): : 145 - 159
  • [2] Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging
    Bryson, John M.
    Crosby, Barbara C.
    Stone, Melissa Middleton
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2015, 75 (05) : 647 - 663
  • [3] Using endemic road features to create self-explaining roads and reduce vehicle speeds
    Charlton, Samuel G.
    Mackie, Hamish W.
    Baas, Peter H.
    Hay, Karen
    Menezes, Miguel
    Dixon, Claire
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2010, 42 (06) : 1989 - 1998
  • [4] Knowledge Exchange Processes in Organizations and Policy Arenas: A Narrative Systematic Review of the Literature
    Contandriopoulos, Damien
    Lemire, Marc
    Denis, Jean-Louis
    Tremblay, Emile
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2010, 88 (04) : 444 - 483
  • [5] Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Aron, David C.
    Keith, Rosalind E.
    Kirsh, Susan R.
    Alexander, Jeffery A.
    Lowery, Julie C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [6] Why 'knowledge transfer' is misconceived for applied social research
    Davies, Huw
    Nutley, Sandra
    Walter, Isabel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 (03) : 188 - 190
  • [7] Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review
    Gagliardi, Anna R.
    Berta, Whitney
    Kothari, Anita
    Boyko, Jennifer
    Urquhart, Robin
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [8] Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations
    Greenhalgh, T
    Robert, G
    Macfarlane, F
    Bate, P
    Kyriakidou, O
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2004, 82 (04) : 581 - 629
  • [9] Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review
    Greenhalgh, Trisha
    Wieringa, Sietse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2011, 104 (12) : 501 - 509
  • [10] What Is This Knowledge That We Seek to "Exchange"?
    Greenhalgh, Trisha
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2010, 88 (04) : 492 - 499