Influence of environmental conditions on dental composite flexural properties

被引:14
作者
Walker, Mary P.
Haj-Ali, Reem
Wang, Yong
Hunziker, Deana
Williams, Karen B.
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Biol, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Sch Dent, Dent Student Res Scholars Program, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Sch Dent, Dept Behav Sci, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
关键词
resin composite; simulated intraoral conditions; specimen fabrication; specification/laboratory testing;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.023
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. To determine if increased relative humidity and temperature simulating intraoral environmental conditions adversely affect flexural properties of dental composites. Methods. Specimen fabrication followed ANSI/ADA specification 27 for resin-based filling materials, except that ambient laboratory conditions (47% relative humidity at 22 degrees C) or simulated intraoral conditions (90% relative humidity at 35 degrees C) were used when fabricating and polymerizing specimens. Ten specimens were made of each of three commercially available composites at each condition. As per the specification, after aging specimens in 10 ml of deionized water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, flexural properties were measured using a 3-point bend test. Results. A two-factor ANOVA and Fisher's least significant difference (LSD) post hoc (alpha = 0.05) indicated there were significant differences in flexural modulus and strength as a function of material, with Z250 = TPH > Prodigy. However, neither flexural modulus nor flexural strength of any material was adversely influenced by fabrication conditions. Significance. Although the flexural properties did not decrease with respect to fabrication conditions, the flexural modulus of some of the materials (TPH Spectrum and Z250) increased when specimens were fabricated at simulated intraoral temperature and relative humidity. Thus, simulation of these factors may be important in laboratory testing, since the resultant properties may better reflect flexural properties associated with dental composite restorations placed clinically. (C) 2005 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1007
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison [J].
Cobb, DS ;
Macgregor, KM ;
Vargas, MA ;
Denehy, GE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 131 (11) :1610-1615
[12]  
Ferracane JL, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V42, P465, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981205)42:3<465::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO
[13]  
2-F
[14]   Immediate versus one-month wet storage fatigue of restorative materials [J].
Gladys, S ;
Braem, M ;
Van Meerbeek, B ;
Lambrechts, P ;
Vanherle, G .
BIOMATERIALS, 1998, 19 (06) :541-544
[15]  
Hasegawa T, 1999, OPER DENT, V24, P323
[16]   Degree of conversion of composites measured by DTA and FTIR [J].
Imazato, S ;
McCabe, JF ;
Tarumi, H ;
Ehara, A ;
Ebisu, S .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2001, 17 (02) :178-183
[17]  
International Organization for Standardization, 2000, 4049 ISO
[18]   SOME EFFECTS OF WATER ON DENTIN BONDING [J].
JACOBSEN, T ;
SODERHOLM, KJ .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (02) :132-136
[19]  
JOYNT RB, 1989, OPER DENT, V14, P176
[20]   WATER SORPTION AND MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES OF LIGHT-CURED PROPRIETARY COMPOSITE TOOTH RESTORATIVE MATERIALS [J].
KALACHANDRA, S ;
WILSON, TW .
BIOMATERIALS, 1992, 13 (02) :105-109