Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles

被引:99
作者
Friedenthal, Jenna [1 ]
Maxwell, Susan M. [1 ]
Munne, Santiago [2 ]
Kramer, Yael [1 ]
McCulloh, David H. [1 ]
McCaffrey, Caroline [1 ]
Grifo, James A. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Fertil Ctr, New York, NY USA
[2] Cooper Genom, Livingston, NJ USA
关键词
Next generation sequencing; array comparative genomic hybridization; preimplantation genetic screening; mosaicism; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; MOSAIC BLASTOCYSTS; ANEUPLOIDY; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPLANTATION; PROTOCOL; STAGE; CGH;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate whether the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET) cycles improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Single university-based fertility center. Patient(s): A total of 916 STEET cycles from January 2014 to December 2016 were identified. Cases included 548 STEET cycles using NGS for PGS and controls included 368 STEET cycles using aCGH for PGS. Intervention(s): Patients having a STEET after undergoing IVF and PGS with either NGS or aCGH. Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary outcomes were implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OP/LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate (PR), and spontaneous abortion (SAB) rate. Result(s): The implantation rate was significantly higher in the NGS group compared with the aCGH group (71.6% vs. 64.6%). The OP/ LBR was also significantly higher in the NGS group (62% vs. 54.4%), and there were significantly more biochemical pregnancies in the aCGH group compared with the NGS group (15.1% vs. 8.7%). After adjustment for confounding variables with a multiple logistic regression analysis, OP/LBR remained significantly higher in the NGS group. The SAB rate was not significantly different in the NGS group compared with the aCGH group (12.4% vs. 12.7%). Conclusion(s): Preimplantation genetic screening using NGS significantly improves pregnancy outcomes versus PGS using aCGH in STEET cycles. Next-generation sequencing has the ability to identify and screen for embryos with reduced viability such as mosaic embryos and those with partial aneuploidies or triploidy. Pregnancy outcomes with NGS may be improved due to the exclusion of these abnormal embryos. (C) 2017 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 632
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   FISH reanalysis of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples of previously array-CGH screened blastocysts shows high accuracy of diagnosis and no major diagnostic impact of mosaicism at the blastocyst stage [J].
Capalbo, Antonio ;
Wright, Graham ;
Elliott, Thomas ;
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria ;
Rienzi, Laura ;
Nagy, Zsolt Peter .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (08) :2298-2307
[2]   Differences in pregnancy outcomes in donor egg frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles following preimplantation genetic screening (PGS): a single center retrospective study [J].
Coates, Alison ;
Bankowski, Brandon J. ;
Kung, Allen ;
Griffin, Darren K. ;
Munne, Santiago .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2017, 34 (01) :71-78
[3]   Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos [J].
Fiorentino, Francesco ;
Biricik, Anil ;
Bono, Sara ;
Spizzichino, Letizia ;
Cotroneo, Ettore ;
Cottone, Giuliano ;
Kokocinski, Felix ;
Michel, Claude-Edouard .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (05) :1375-U41
[4]   In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Forman, Eric J. ;
Hong, Kathleen H. ;
Ferry, Kathleen M. ;
Tao, Xin ;
Taylor, Deanne ;
Levy, Brynn ;
Treff, Nathan R. ;
Scott, Richard T., Jr. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (01) :100-+
[5]   THE DEVELOPMENTAL POTENTIAL OF MOSAIC EMBRYOS [J].
Fragouli, E. ;
Alfarawati, S. ;
Spath, K. ;
Tarozzi, N. ;
Borini, A. ;
Wells, D. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) :E96-E96
[6]   Healthy Babies after Intrauterine Transfer of Mosaic Aneuploid Blastocysts [J].
Greco, Ermanno ;
Minasi, Maria Giulia ;
Fiorentino, Francesco .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (21) :2089-2090
[7]   Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos [J].
Gutierrez-Mateo, Cristina ;
Colls, Pere ;
Sanchez-Garcia, Jorge ;
Escudero, Tomas ;
Prates, Renata ;
Ketterson, Kelly ;
Wells, Dagan ;
Munne, Santiago .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (03) :953-958
[8]   24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies [J].
Handyside, Alan H. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) :595-602
[9]   A CYTOGENETIC STUDY OF 1000 SPONTANEOUS-ABORTIONS [J].
HASSOLD, T ;
CHEN, N ;
FUNKHOUSER, J ;
JOOSS, T ;
MANUEL, B ;
MATSUURA, J ;
MATSUYAMA, A ;
WILSON, C ;
YAMANE, JA ;
JACOBS, PA .
ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1980, 44 (OCT) :151-178
[10]   Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol [J].
Johnson, D. S. ;
Gemelos, G. ;
Baner, J. ;
Ryan, A. ;
Cinnioglu, C. ;
Banjevic, M. ;
Ross, R. ;
Alper, M. ;
Barrett, B. ;
Frederick, J. ;
Potter, D. ;
Behr, B. ;
Rabinowitz, M. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 (04) :1066-1075