The relative influence of trustor and trustee individual differences on peer assessments of trust

被引:10
作者
Naber, Andrew M. [1 ]
Payne, Stephanie C. [2 ]
Webber, Sheila Simsarian [3 ]
机构
[1] Aptima Inc, 1010 N Glebe Rd, Arlington, VA 22201 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Suffolk Univ, Boston, MA 02108 USA
关键词
Trust; Individual differences; Actor-partner interdependence model; Big Five; Personality; GMA; Dyad; Teams; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; JOB-PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST; INTEGRATIVE MODEL; ADVERSE IMPACT; PERSONALITY; TEAMS; PERCEPTIONS; PERSPECTIVE; PARTNER;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.022
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study extends research on the antecedents of peer trust by examining team member trust relationships over time in order to examine the relative influence of both trustor and trustee individual differences on assessments of trust, as well as the mutual nature of trust. Data from 216 individuals embedded in 71 project teams were collected on three different occasions using multiple sources. Analyses using the group actor-partner interdependence model indicated both trustor and trustee cognitive and noncognitive individual differences including general mental ability, knowledge, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience contributed to being trusted and trusting others. Trust among team members was mutual within, but not across time periods. This study expands our understanding of peer trust by revealing the relative importance of trustor and trustee individual differences.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? [J].
Anderson, CA ;
Lindsay, AJ ;
Bushman, BJ .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 8 (01) :3-9
[3]   Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide [J].
Campbell, L ;
Kashy, DA .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2002, 9 (03) :327-342
[4]   Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance [J].
Colquitt, Jason A. ;
Scott, Brent A. ;
LePine, Jeffery A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (04) :909-927
[5]  
Costa PT., 1992, Personality & Individual Differences, V13, P653, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I, 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I, 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-1, DOI 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-1]
[6]   Big Five Predictors of Behavior and Perceptions in Initial Dyadic Interactions: Personality Similarity Helps Extraverts and Introverts, but Hurts "Disagreeables" [J].
Cuperman, Ronen ;
Ickes, William .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 97 (04) :667-684
[7]   Beyond Shared Perceptions of Trust and Monitoring in Teams: Implications of Asymmetry and Dissensus [J].
De Jong, Bart A. ;
Dirks, Kurt T. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (02) :391-406
[8]   Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice [J].
Dirks, KT ;
Ferrin, DL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (04) :611-628
[9]   The Relationship Between Being Perceived as Trustworthy by Coworkers and Individual Performance [J].
Dirks, Kurt T. ;
Skarlicki, Daniel P. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2009, 35 (01) :136-157
[10]   Survey and behavioral measurements of interpersonal trust [J].
Evans, Anthony M. ;
Revelle, William .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2008, 42 (06) :1585-1593