Environmental cues for mass nesting of sea turtles

被引:24
作者
Barik, Shraban K. [1 ]
Mohanty, Pratap K. [1 ]
Kar, Prabin K. [1 ]
Behera, Balaji [1 ]
Patra, Sisir K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Berhampur Univ, Dept Marine Sci, Berhampur 760007, Orissa, India
[2] Natl Inst Ocean Technol, Madras 600100, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
LEPIDOCHELYS-OLIVACEA; INANIMATE FLOTSAM; CARETTA-CARETTA; COLUMBUS CRABS; MARINE TURTLES; CHELONIA-MYDAS; SITE SELECTION; ORISSA COAST; CONSEQUENCES; ECOSYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.04.018
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Mass nesting of Olive Ridley sea turtles at Rushikulya rookery exhibit interannaul variability in population size as well as location of nesting site. This year mass nesting was observed over sand spit (0.25 million) and sporadic nesting (0.05 million) at the rookery and the nesting population surpassed all previous records. The present study examines multiple environmental cues (beach width, volume, shoreline change, foreshore slope, sediment grain size, littoral environmental observation, wind speed and direction) during mass nesting events to assess the factor(s) which favour mass nesting and also the reasons for the record mass nesting over a new site (sand spit). Analysis of results indicates that beach/spit to the north of the river mouth with medium width, mild slope and medium sand grain is a favoured location for mass nesting. Near shore oceanographic conditions conducive for mass nesting are low saline near shore surface water, low energy and relatively longer period south southeasterly waves. Local wind burst with a few days lag/lead of the new/full moon appears as one of the most important factors which trigger mass nesting. Environmental cues for selection of mass nesting site and the factor triggering the mass nesting revealed in the present study are of paramount importance for rookery management and conservation of the vulnerable sea turtles. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Abreu-Grobois A., 2008, IUCN RED LIST THREAT, DOI [10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T11534A3292503.en, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T11534A3292503.EN]
[2]  
Bernardo J., 2007, Biology and Conservation of Ridley Sea Turtles, P59
[3]  
Bjorndal KA, 2003, CRC MAR BIOL SER, P259
[4]   NUTRITION AND GRAZING BEHAVIOR OF THE GREEN TURTLE CHELONIA-MYDAS [J].
BJORNDAL, KA .
MARINE BIOLOGY, 1980, 56 (02) :147-154
[5]   GRADISTAT: A grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments [J].
Blott, SJ ;
Pye, K .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2001, 26 (11) :1237-1248
[6]  
Bouchard SS, 2000, ECOLOGY, V81, P2305, DOI 10.2307/177116
[7]  
Chaudhari S., 2009, IMPACT CASUARINA PLA
[8]   Comparisons of social structure of Columbus crabs living on loggerhead sea turtles and inanimate flotsam [J].
Dellinger, T ;
Davenport, J ;
Wirtz, P .
JOURNAL OF THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, 1997, 77 (01) :185-194
[9]   Construction setback regulations and sea-level rise:: Mitigating sea turtle nesting beach loss [J].
Fish, M. R. ;
Cote, I. M. ;
Horrocks, J. A. ;
Mulligan, B. ;
Watkinson, A. R. ;
Jones, A. P. .
OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (04) :330-341
[10]  
Foley AM, 2006, CHELONIAN CONSERV BI, V5, P32, DOI 10.2744/1071-8443(2006)5[32:EOSCAI]2.0.CO