Vulnerable children's rights to participation, protection, and provision: The process of defining the problem in Swedish child and family welfare

被引:91
作者
Heimer, Maria [1 ]
Nasman, Elisabet [2 ]
Palme, Joakim [1 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Govt, Box 514, S-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Sociol, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
child abuse (neglect); child protection; child welfare; child-centred research; children's participation; children's rights; DECISION-MAKING; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/cfs.12424
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This study addresses the relationship between children's participation and the protection and provision offered to them by social services in Sweden. It applies a theoretical framework for analysing child welfare that is anchored in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. How child participation may affect child protection and provision is examined empirically using case documentation from 2 municipalities. The main finding is that when children are not given voice or opportunity to influence the framing of what the problem is, the design of protection and care tends to be poorly matched to the actual problems documented in the child investigation and vice versa; when children can influence framing, this is associated with well-matched protection and care. This suggests that traditional child welfare ethos, to the effect that protection should be of such overriding concern that children even should be protected from participation, is misguided. The study further illustrates the intrinsic problems with the family orientation of Swedish social services and its reliance on partnership with parents, which makes it difficult to live up to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Incorporating child participation into existing service models can transform Swedish social services to an augmented child-focused system that by ensuring participation also promotes protection and provision.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 323
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]   Collaborating with families in differential responses: practitioners' views [J].
Healy, Karen ;
Harrison, Gai ;
Venables, Jemma ;
Bosly, Fiona .
CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2016, 21 (03) :328-338
[12]   Rethinking Child Policy Post-UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Vulnerable Children's Welfare in Sweden [J].
Heimer, Maria ;
Palme, Joakim .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2016, 45 (03) :435-452
[13]   My life in care: experiences of non-participation in decision-making processes [J].
Leeson, Caroline .
CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2007, 12 (03) :268-277
[14]  
LITTLECHILD B., 2000, CHILD ABUSE REV, V9, P403
[15]  
Mason Jan., 2005, Children Taken Seriously, P91
[16]  
Morel Nathalie., 2012, Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?: Ideas, Policies and Challenges
[17]   Out of time: theorizing family in social work practice [J].
Morris, Kate ;
White, Sue ;
Doherty, Paula ;
Warwick, Lisa .
CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2017, 22 :51-60
[18]   Balancing parents' and very young children's rights in care proceedings: decision-making in the context of the Human Rights Act 1998 [J].
Munro, Emily R. ;
Ward, Harriet .
CHILD & FAMILY SOCIAL WORK, 2008, 13 (02) :227-234
[19]  
Palys T., 2008, SAGE ENCY QUALITATIV, DOI [10.4135/9781412963909.n349, DOI 10.4135/9781412963909.N349]
[20]  
Parton N., 2014, The politics of child protection: contemporary developments and future directions