Optimal inertial sensor location for ambulatory measurement of trunk inclination

被引:60
作者
Faber, Gert S. [1 ]
Kingma, Idsart [1 ]
Bruijn, Sjoerd M. [1 ]
van Dieen, Jaap H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Human Movement Sci, Res Inst MOVE, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Trunk inclination; Inertial sensor; Ergonomics; Low back pain; Ambulatory measurement; LOW-BACK-PAIN; WORK; ORIENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.024
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Trunk inclination (TI) is used often to quantify back loading in ergonomic workplace evaluation. The aim of the present study was to determine whether TI can be obtained using a single inertial sensor (IS) on the back, and to determine the optimal IS location on the back for the estimation of TI. Gold standard TI, the angle between the vertical and the line connecting the L5/S1 joint and the trunk centre of mass, was measured using an optoelectronic system. Ten subjects performed experimental trials, each consisting of a symmetric and an asymmetric lifting task, and of a left-right lateral flexion movement Trials were repeated and, in between trials. the IS was shifted in small steps from a location on the thorax towards a location on the sacrum. Optimal IS location was defined as the IS location with minimum root-meansquare (RMS) error between the gold standard TI and the IS TI. Averaged over subjects, the optimal IS location for symmetric and asymmetric lifting was at about 25% of the distance from the midpoint between the posterior superior iliac spines (MPSIS) to the C7 spinous process. The RMS error at this location, averaged over subjects, was 4.6 +/- 2.9 degrees For the left-right lateral flexion task, the optimal IS location was at about 30% of the MPSIS to C7 distance. Because in most activities of daily living, pure lateral flexion does not occur often, it is recommended place the IS at 25% of the distance from the MPSIS to C7. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2406 / 2409
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   A survey of lifting and lowering tasks [J].
Dempsey, PG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2003, 31 (01) :11-16
[2]   Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain -: Results of a prospective cohort study [J].
Hoogendoorn, WE ;
Bongers, PM ;
de Vet, HCW ;
Douwes, M ;
Koes, BW ;
Miedema, MC ;
Ariëns, GAM ;
Bouter, LM .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (23) :3087-3092
[3]   Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods [J].
Li, GY ;
Buckle, P .
ERGONOMICS, 1999, 42 (05) :674-695
[4]  
Lötters F, 2003, SCAND J WORK ENV HEA, V29, P431
[5]   Measuring orientation of human body segments using miniature gyroscopes and accelerometers [J].
Luinge, HJ ;
Veltink, PH .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2005, 43 (02) :273-282
[6]   ANATOMICAL DATA FOR ANALYZING HUMAN MOTION [J].
PLAGENHOEF, S ;
EVANS, FG ;
ABDELNOUR, T .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1983, 54 (02) :169-178
[7]  
Reynolds HerberM., 1982, Spatial geometry of the human pelvis
[8]   Compensation of magnetic disturbances improves inertial and magnetic sensing of human body segment orientation [J].
Roetenberg, D ;
Luinge, HJ ;
Baten, CTM ;
Veltink, PH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2005, 13 (03) :395-405
[9]   Estimation of trunk inclination by means of an inclinometer [J].
Seo, A ;
Kakehashi, M ;
Tsuru, S ;
Yoshinaga, F .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 1997, 39 (01) :51-56
[10]  
TALONI S, 2004, OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOM, V4, P281