Pedestrian preferences with respect to roundabouts-A video-based stated preference survey

被引:25
作者
Perdomo, Mario [1 ]
Rezaei, Ali [1 ]
Patterson, Zachary [1 ]
Saunier, Nicolas [2 ]
Miranda-Moreno, Luis F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Geog Planning & Environm, Transport Res Integrated Planning TRIP Lab, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Polytech Montreal, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Appl Mech, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
Roundabouts; Pedestrians; Stated preference methods; Vulnerable user safety; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS; SAFETY; PERCEPTIONS; CYCLISTS; DRIVERS; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2014.03.010
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Research on user behavior and preferences has been a helpful tool in improving road safety and accident prevention in recent years. At the same time, there remain some important areas of road safety and accident prevention for which user preferences, despite their importance, have not been explored. Most road safety research has not explicitly addressed vulnerable user (pedestrians and cyclists) preferences with respect to roundabouts, despite their increasing construction around the world. The present research stems from the fact that studies related to roundabout safety have generally focused on drivers, while overlooking the importance of safety as it relates to vulnerable users, especially pedestrians. Moreover, it handles this particular issue through an approach that has not been used so far in this context; the Stated Preference (SP) survey. As such, there are two main goals (and contributions) of this work. First, to show how SP surveys can be used to investigate the importance of different design and operational features to pedestrian perceptions of safety in roundabouts. This allows us, for example, to quantify how some features of roundabouts (e.g. high traffic volume) can be compensated for by design features such as pedestrian islands. This is useful in helping to design roundabouts that pedestrians prefer and will hopefully use, to help encourage active transport. Second, to demonstrate how traffic simulation software can be successfully used to include difficult-to-communicate attributes in SP surveys. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 91
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 672 NCHRP
[2]  
[Anonymous], TRANSPORTATION RES R, DOI DOI 10.3141/1556-11
[3]   Transport stated choice responses: effects of task complexity, presentation format and literacy [J].
Arentze, T ;
Borgers, A ;
Timmermans, H ;
DelMistro, R .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2003, 39 (03) :229-244
[4]   Microscopic pedestrian simulation model combined with a tactical model for route choice behaviour [J].
Asano, Miho ;
Iryo, Takamasa ;
Kuwahara, Masao .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2010, 18 (06) :842-855
[5]   Circulatory markings at double-lane traffic roundabout: Comparison of two marking schemes [J].
Bie, Jing ;
Lo, Hong K. ;
Wong, S. C. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (09) :378-388
[6]   The impact of waiting time and other factors on dangerous pedestrian crossings and violations at signalized intersections: A case study in Montreal [J].
Brosseau, Marilyne ;
Zangenehpour, Sohail ;
Saunier, Nicolas ;
Miranda-Moreno, Luis .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 21 :159-172
[7]   Cyclists and drivers in road interactions: A comparison of perceived crash risk [J].
Chaurand, Nadine ;
Delhomme, Patricia .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 50 :1176-1184
[8]   Investigation of models for relating roundabout safety to predicted speed [J].
Chen, Yongsheng ;
Persaud, Bhagwant ;
Sacchi, Emanuele ;
Bassani, Marco .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 50 :196-203
[9]  
Chu X., 2004, J TRANSPORTATION RES, V1978
[10]   Severity of injury resulting from pedestrian-vehicle crashes: What can we learn from examining the built environment? [J].
Clifton, Kelly J. ;
Burnier, Carolina V. ;
Akar, Gulsah .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (06) :425-436