Wildfire risk, biodiversity and pen-urban planning in the Mt Lofty Ranges, South Australia

被引:32
作者
Bardsley, D. K. [1 ]
Weber, D. [2 ,3 ]
Robinson, G. M. [1 ]
Moskwa, E. [4 ]
Bardsley, A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Social Sci, Geog Environm & Populat, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ S Australia, Sch Nat & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia
[3] Univ S Australia, Barbara Hardy Inst, Adelaide, SA 5095, Australia
[4] Univ S Australia, Sch Nat & Built Environm, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Risk; Wildfire; Biodiversity conservation; Reflexivity; Urban development; Planning; Pen-urban; South Australia; VEGETATION CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EUROPEAN SETTLEMENT; FLEURIEU PENINSULA; MANAGEMENT; POLICY; FIRE; FOREST; INTERFACE; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.012
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Major fires on the periphery of Australian cities are reframing perceptions of what constitutes effective landscape planning and vegetation management. The emerging governance challenge to simultaneously mitigate wildfire risk and support improved conservation practices is reviewed in the context of pre-colonial and modern cultures within the pen-urban Mediterranean climatic region of South Australia's Mt Lofty Ranges. The analysis suggests that anthropogenic burning of landscape has been a vital historical component of risk management. During the early modern era however, improved capacities to manage wildfire risk led to complacency in light of the hazard, which in turn has led to urbanization that has not sufficiently accounted for the levels of risk. A planning conflict is emerging within the wooded uplands as there is renewed interest in wildfire risk, which is reflected in new state policies providing greater allowances for land owners to clear vegetation around dwellings. Although attempts have been made to constrain urban growth around the city of Adelaide, recent workshops with key environmental management stakeholders suggest that urbanization continues within the Mt Lofty Ranges in areas that are both highly vulnerable to fire and of great importance for biodiversity conservation, such that planning is not reflecting the cultures of risk or biodiversity value. For such risks and values to be taken into account within reflexive systems of governance, the narratives on opportunities for adaptation generated by the people who facilitate vegetation management must be accommodated into deliberations on policy. The identification and planning of particularly vulnerable and valuable spaces within the broader landscape and cultural contexts of risk and value would enable complex, targeted responses to environmental hazards, conservation and development needs in the pen-urban uplands. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 165
页数:11
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
Adams M, 2011, BURNING ISSUES: SUSTAINABILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF AUSTRALIA'S SOUTHERN FORESTS, P1
[2]   Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field [J].
Allen, A .
ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2003, 15 (01) :135-147
[3]  
AMLR (Adelaide-Mt Lofty Ranges) Natural Resource Management (NRM) Board, 2010, 10 YEAR PLAN REG, VB
[4]  
Ammann WJ, 2006, PROC MONOGR ENG WATE, P3
[5]  
[Anonymous], NATURAL HIST ADELAID
[6]  
[Anonymous], PREPARED CLIMATE CHA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Time of Transitions
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INF BIOD CONS AD MOU
[9]   The amenity complex: Towards a framework for analysing and predicting the emergence of a multifunctional countryside in Australia [J].
Argent, Neil ;
Smailes, Peter ;
Griffin, Trevor .
GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 45 (03) :217-232
[10]  
Banks E, 2012, RISK CULTURE: A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO BUILDING AND STRENGTHENING THE FABRIC OF RISK MANAGEMENT, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137263728